Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28360634›Full record

ArticleNoro psikiyatri arsivi2014

Triage of Patients in the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Outpatient Clinic.

Şahbal Aras, Fatma Varol Taş, Burak Baykara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 75% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Şahbal ArasDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Fatma Varol TaşDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Burak BaykaraDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Dokuz Eylül University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to evaluate and describe the three-stage triage method used in a child and adolescent psychiatry outpatient clinic.

methodThe study investigated the new allocation process of 1482 children and adolescents who were assessed using this triage system for the duration of one year, in the year 2005. Data of 1423 children and adolescents who presented in 2003 regarding the waiting time for the first appointment and the rate of nonattendance at the first appointment were used for the comparison. In triage system, new patients presenting to the outpatient clinic in the morning four days a week were assessed by a three-stage procedure: An initial Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire screening and a structured interview administered by an intern was then followed by a clinical interview.

resultsOf the 1482 children and adolescents who presented to the outpatient clinic during the study period, 1291 were given further appointments. Among patients who presented in 2005, the 207 non-attendant patients were significantly more likely to have longer waiting times than the 1084 attendant patients. When compared to year 2003, it was found that there was a significant decrease in the median waiting time for the first appointment and the rate of nonattendance at the first appointment among patients who presented in 2005.

conclusionThe triage procedure used in this study may constitute a model for developing countries with limited health care resources.

Indexed as

child and adolescent psychiatryoutpatientTriage assessment

Identifiers

PMID28360634
PMCPMC5353131
OpenAlexW2319413567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.