Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28360409›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2017

Vascularization Potential of Electrospun Poly(L-Lactide-co-Caprolactone) Scaffold: The Impact for Tissue Engineering.

Arkadiusz Jundziłł, Marta Pokrywczyńska, Jan Adamowicz, Tomasz Kowalczyk, Maciej Nowacki, Magdalena Bodnar, Andrzej Marszałek, Małgorzata Frontczak-Baniewicz, Grzegorz Mikułowski, Tomasz Kloskowski and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Angiogenesis in Tissue Engineering: As Nature Intended?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Short histological kaleidoscope - recent findings in histology. Part I.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Arkadiusz JundziłłChair of Urology, Department of Regenerative Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Marta PokrywczyńskaChair of Urology, Department of Regenerative Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Jan AdamowiczChair of Urology, Department of Regenerative Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Tomasz KowalczykInstitute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej NowackiChair and Department of Surgical Oncology, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Magdalena BodnarDepartment of Clinical Pathomorphology, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Andrzej MarszałekDepartment of Clinical Pathomorphology, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Małgorzata Frontczak-BaniewiczElectron Microscopy Platform, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Grzegorz MikułowskiInstitute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Tomasz KloskowskiChair of Urology, Department of Regenerative Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
James GatherwrightDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals - Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Tomasz DrewaChair of Urology, Department of Regenerative Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Nicolaus Copernicus University · PLInstitute of Fundamental Technological Research · PLMossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLUniversity Hospitals Case Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Electrospun nanofibers have widespread putative applications in the field of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. When compared to naturally occurring collagen matrices, electrospun nanofiber scaffolds have two distinct advantages: they do not induce a foreign body reaction and they are not at risk for biological contamination. However, the exact substrate, structure, and production methods have yet to be defined. MATERIAL AND METHODS In the current study, tubular-shaped poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone) (PLCL) constructs produced using electrospinning technology were evaluated for their potential application in the field of tissue regeneration in two separate anatomic locations: the skin and the abdomen. The constructs were designed to have an internal diameter of 3 mm and thickness of 200 μm. Using a rodent model, 20 PLCL tubular constructs were surgically implanted in the abdominal cavity and subcutaneously. The constructs were then evaluated histologically using electron microscopy at 6 weeks post-implantation. RESULTS Histological evaluation and analysis using scanning electron microscopy showed that pure scaffolds by themselves were able to induce angiogenesis after implantation in the rat model. Vascularization was observed in both tested groups; however, better results were obtained after intraperitoneal implantation. Formation of more and larger vessels that migrated inside the scaffold was observed after implantation into the peritoneum. In this group no evidence of inflammation and better integration of scaffold with host tissue were noticed. Subcutaneous implantation resulted in more fibrotic reaction, and differences in cell morphology were also observed between the two tested groups. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a standardized evaluation of a PLCL conduit structure in two different anatomic locations, demonstrating the excellent ability of the structure to achieve vascularization. Functional, histological, and mechanical data clearly indicate prospective clinical utilization of PLCL in critical size defect regeneration.

Indexed as

Neovascularization, PhysiologicAnimalsBlood VesselsMalePeritoneumPolyestersProsthesis ImplantationRats, WistarStress, MechanicalSubcutaneous TissueTensile StrengthTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffoldslactide-caprolactone copolymerPolyesters

Identifiers

PMID28360409
PMCPMC5386432
OpenAlexW2603555009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.