Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28360240›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2017

Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of psychological and medical treatments for binge-eating disorder (MetaBED): study protocol.

Anja Hilbert, David Petroff, Stephan Herpertz, Anette Kersting, Reinhard Pietrowsky, Brunna Tuschen-Caffier, Silja Vocks, Ricarda Schmidt

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Open science practices for eating disorders research.The International journal of eating disorders · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anja HilbertDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
David PetroffClinical Trial Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Stephan HerpertzDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, LWL-University Clinic, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Anette KerstingDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Reinhard PietrowskyDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Brunna Tuschen-CaffierDepartment of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Silja VocksDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Ricarda SchmidtDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEOsnabrück University · DERuhr University Bochum · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBinge-eating disorder (BED) was included as its own diagnostic entity in the Fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). An increasing number of treatment studies have been published, but an up-to-date comprehensive meta-analysis on diverse treatment approaches for BED is lacking. In an updated and extension of a previous meta-analysis, the goals of this study are to assess the short-term and long-term effectiveness of psychological and medical treatments for BED. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search bibliographic databases and study registries, including manual searches for studies published before January 2016. The search strategy will include terms relating to binge eating and diverse forms of psychological and medical interventions. Language will be restricted to English. The studies included will be treatment studies, that is, randomised-controlled trials, and non-randomised and non-controlled studies, for individuals with BED (DSM-IV or DSM-5), and studies that provided a pre-treatment and at least one post-treatment or follow-up assessment of binge eating. The primary outcomes will be the number of binge-eating episodes, abstinence from binge eating and diagnosis of BED at post-treatment and/or follow-up(s), and changes from pre-treatment to post-treatment and/or follow-up(s). Likewise, as secondary outcomes, eating disorder and general psychopathology, quality of life, and body weight will be analysed and adverse events and treatment drop-out will be examined. Study search, selection and data extraction, including risk of bias assessment, will be independently performed by 2 reviewers and consensus will be sought. Moderator analyses will be conducted, and equity aspects will be considered. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted to determine the robustness of the results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this meta-analysis. Published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated electronically and in print, this meta-analysis will form the basis of the renewal of the German evidence-based S3 Guidelines of Diagnosis and Treatment of Eating Disorders, specifically BED. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016043604.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryBinge-Eating DisorderClinical Trials as TopicData CollectionHumansInformation DisseminationMeta-Analysis as TopicPsychotherapySelection BiasSelf CareTreatment OutcomeWeight Lossbariatric surgerybinge-eating disordermeta-analysispharmacotherapypsychotherapytreatment

Identifiers

PMID28360240
PMCPMC5372140
OpenAlexW2601777755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.