Opioid analgesic dependence: where do we go from here?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Augmenting large language models to predict social determinants of mental health in opioid use disorder using patient clinical notes.JAMIA open · 2025
   Article
2. Hopes and fears before opioid tapering: a quantitative and qualitative study of patients with chronic pain and long-term opioids.British journal of pain · 2021
   Article
3. A squash and a squeeze.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
   Article
4. Long-term benzodiazepine and Z-drugs use in England: a survey of general practice [corrected].The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
   Article
5. Bad Medicine: The medical untouchables.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  A squash and a squeeze.2018

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as