Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28360025›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017

Design and Implementation of a Novel Web-Based E-Learning Tool for Education of Health Professionals on the Antibiotic Vancomycin.

Stuart Evan Bond, Shelley P Crowther, Suman Adhikari, Adriana J Chubaty, Ping Yu, Jay P Borchard, Craig Steven Boutlis, Wilfred Winston Yeo, Spiros Miyakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Role of Games and Social Media in Medical Education: A Narrative Review.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stuart Evan BondWollongong Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9640-2474
Shelley P CrowtherWollongong Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4259-3484
Suman AdhikariSt George Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Kogarah, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5454-4300
Adriana J ChubatyPrince of Wales Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4905-1269
Ping YuSchool of Computing and Information Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7910-9396
Jay P BorchardResearch Central, Wollongong Hospital, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3651-898X
Craig Steven BoutlisWollongong Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4754-0501
Wilfred Winston YeoSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9554-5203
Spiros MiyakisSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4268-1599

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional approaches to health professional education are being challenged by increased clinical demands and decreased available time. Web-based e-learning tools offer a convenient and effective method of delivering education, particularly across multiple health care facilities. The effectiveness of this model for health professional education needs to be explored in context.

objectivesThe study aimed to (1) determine health professionals' experience and knowledge of clinical use of vancomycin, an antibiotic used for treatment of serious infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and (2) describe the design and implementation of a Web-based e-learning tool created to improve knowledge in this area.

methodsWe conducted a study on the design and implementation of a video-enhanced, Web-based e-learning tool between April 2014 and January 2016. A Web-based survey was developed to determine prior experience and knowledge of vancomycin use among nurses, doctors, and pharmacists. The Vancomycin Interactive (VI) involved a series of video clips interspersed with question and answer scenarios, where a correct response allowed for progression. Dramatic tension and humor were used as tools to engage users. Health professionals' knowledge of clinical vancomycin use was obtained from website data; qualitative participant feedback was also collected.

resultsFrom the 577 knowledge survey responses, pharmacists (n=70) answered the greatest number of questions correctly (median score 4/5), followed by doctors (n=271; 3/5) and nurses (n=236; 2/5; P<.001). Survey questions on target trough concentration (75.0%, 433/577) and rate of administration (64.9%, 375/577) were answered most correctly, followed by timing of first level (49%, 283/577), maintenance dose (41.9%, 242/577), and loading dose (38.0%, 219/577). Self-reported "very" and "reasonably" experienced health professionals were also more likely to achieve correct responses. The VI was completed by 163 participants during the study period. The rate of correctly answered VI questions on first attempt was 65% for nurses (n=63), 68% for doctors (n=86), and 82% for pharmacists (n=14; P<.001), reflecting a similar pattern to the knowledge survey. Knowledge gaps were identified for loading dose (39.2% correct on first attempt; 64/163), timing of first trough level (50.3%, 82/163), and subsequent trough levels (47.9%, 78/163). Of the 163 participants, we received qualitative user feedback from 51 participants following completion of the VI. Feedback was predominantly positive with themes of "entertaining," "engaging," and "fun" identified; however, there were some technical issues identified relating to accessibility from different operating systems and browsers.

conclusionsA novel Web-based e-learning tool was successfully developed combining game design principles and humor to improve user engagement. Knowledge gaps were identified that allowed for targeting of future education strategies. The VI provides an innovative model for delivering Web-based education to busy health professionals in different locations.

Indexed as

InternetAnti-Bacterial AgentsComputer-Assisted InstructionEducation, MedicalHealth PersonnelHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusProspective StudiesStaphylococcal InfectionsSurveys and QuestionnairesVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinanti-bacterial agentscontinuing educationmedical educationnursing educationpharmacy educationsurvey methodsvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID28360025
PMCPMC5391435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.