Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28359269›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2017

The role of the built environment in explaining educational inequalities in walking and cycling among adults in the Netherlands.

Daniël C van Wijk, Joost Oude Groeniger, Frank J van Lenthe, Carlijn B M Kamphuis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health geographics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Health Care and Productivity Costs of Non-Fatal Traffic Injuries: A Comparison of Road User Types.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The role of the natural and built environment in cycling duration in the Netherlands.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniël C van WijkDepartment of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Joost Oude GroenigerDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank J van LentheDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Carlijn B M KamphuisDepartment of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands. c.b.m.kamphuis@uu.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study examined whether characteristics of the residential built environment (i.e. population density, level of mixed land use, connectivity, accessibility of facilities, accessibility of green) contributed to educational inequalities in walking and cycling among adults.

methodsData from participants (32-82 years) of the 2011 survey of the Dutch population-based GLOBE study were used (N = 2375). Highest attained educational level (independent variable) and walking for transport, cycling for transport, walking in leisure time and cycling in leisure time (dependent variables) were self-reported in the survey. GIS-systems were used to obtain spatial data on residential built environment characteristics. A four-step mediation-based analysis with log-linear regression models was used to examine to contribution of the residential built environment to educational inequalities in walking and cycling.

resultsAs compared to the lowest educational group, the highest educational group was more likely to cycle for transport (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-1.23), walk in leisure time (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.21), and cycle in leisure time (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.22). Objective built environment characteristics were related to these outcomes, but contributed minimally to educational inequalities in walking and cycling. On the other hand, compared to the lowest educational group, the highest educational group was less likely to walk for transport (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.82-1.01), which could partly be attributed to differences in the built environment.

conclusionThis study found that objective built environment characteristics contributed minimally to educational inequalities in walking and cycling in the Netherlands.

Indexed as

Educational StatusEnvironment DesignResidence CharacteristicsSocioeconomic FactorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBicyclingCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPopulation SurveillanceWalkingBuilt environmentCyclingGISHealth inequalitiesNeighborhoodWalking

Identifiers

PMID28359269
PMCPMC5374661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.