ArticleCurrent cancer drug targets2017
Method to Assess Interactivity of Drugs with Nonparallel Concentration Effect Relationships.
Article in Current cancer drug targets, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Quantitative Pharmacology Model of Exosome-Mediated Drug Efflux and Perturbation-Induced Synergy.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Pharmacodynamic Drug-Drug Interactions.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCommonly used methods for analyzing interactivity between drugs (e.g. synergy, antagonism) such as isobologram, combination index, and curve shift are based on the Loewe Additivity principle of dose equivalence and the inherent assumption of similar concentration- effect (C-E) including parallel curves and equal maximum effects (Emax), and therefore are not suitable for drugs with dissimilar C-E. This study describes a new method that is without this limitation and has the additional advantage of enabling statistical analysis. METHODS AND
resultsThe method comprises two steps. First, based on the dose equivalence principle, the experimentally obtained C-E of one drug was used to calculate the equally effective C-E of the other drug at no interactivity; the resulting two zero-interactivity C-E formed the upper and lower boundaries of Additivity Envelope. Next, 95% confidence intervals calculated from experimental data were added to Additivity Envelope to obtain Uncertainty Envelope (UE). Experimentally observed effects of drug combinations (C-Ecomb,observed) located within UE indicate additivity whereas C-Ecomb,observed located above or below UE indicate statistically significant (p<0.05) synergy or antagonism, respectively. Additional in silico studies demonstrated the shape and size of Additivity Envelope, which determines the ability to detect drug interactivity, depended on the Drug A-to-B concentration ratios and the ratios of their C-E curve shape parameter. Analyses of experimental results of combinations of drugs with nonparallel C-E and/or unequal Emax indicated UE as more versatile and provided more information, compared to earlier methods.
conclusionUE is a broadly applicable method for analysis, including statistical significance assessment, of drug interactivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.