Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28358959›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2017

A Bioengineering Approach to Myopia Control Tested in a Guinea Pig Model.

Mariana B Garcia, Amit K Jha, Kevin E Healy, Christine F Wildsoet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Scleral structure and biomechanics.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mariana B GarciaVision Science Graduate Group, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States.
Amit K JhaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States 3Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States.
Kevin E HealyDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States 3Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States.
Christine F WildsoetVision Science Graduate Group, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States 2Department of Bioengineering, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States 3Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States.
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Mechanisms underlying emmetropization and local eye growth regulationR01EY012392 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI WILDSOET, CHRISTINE FRANCES · 1999 to 2018
$4.6M
Novel Tissue-Engineered Treatments for Myopia ControlR21EY019628 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HEALY, KEVIN EDWARD, WILDSOET, CHRISTINE FRANCES · 2009 to 2010
$410k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012392NEI NIH HHS R21 EY019628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the biocompatibility of an injectable hydrogel and its ability to control myopia progression in guinea pigs. Methods: The study used a hydrogel synthesized from acrylated hyaluronic acid with a conjugated cell-binding peptide and enzymatically degradable crosslinker. Seven-day-old guinea pigs were first form deprived (FD) with diffusers for 1 week. One group was kept as an FD-only control; two groups received a sub-Tenon's capsule injection of either hydrogel or buffer (sham surgery) at the posterior pole of the eye. Form deprivation treatments were then continued for 3 additional weeks. Treatment effects were evaluated in terms of ocular axial length and refractive error. Safety was evaluated via intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, flash electroretinograms (ERG), and histology. Results: Both hydrogel and sham surgery groups showed significantly reduced axial elongation and myopia progression compared to the FD-only group. For axial lengths, net changes in interocular difference (treated minus control) were 0.04 ± 0.06, 0.02 ± 0.09, and 0.24 ± 0.08 mm for hydrogel, sham, and FD-only groups, respectively (P = 0.0006). Intraocular pressures, visual acuities, and ERGs of treated eyes were not significantly different from contralateral controls. Extensive cell migration into the implants was evident. Both surgery groups showed noticeable Tenon's capsule thickening. Conclusions: Sub-Tenon's capsule injections of both hydrogel and buffer inhibited myopia progression, with no adverse effects on ocular health. The latter unexpected effect warrants further investigation as a potential novel myopia control therapy. That the hydrogel implant supported significant cell infiltration offers further proof of its biocompatibility, with potential application as a tool for drug and cell delivery.

Indexed as

Refraction, OcularVisual AcuityAnimalsBioengineeringDisease Models, AnimalElectroretinographyGuinea PigsHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateInjectionsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMyopiaSensory DeprivationTreatment OutcomeHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate

Identifiers

PMID28358959
PMCPMC5374882
OpenAlexW2603682949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.