Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28358902›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Screening for AMPA receptor auxiliary subunit specific modulators.

Caleigh M Azumaya, Emily L Days, Paige N Vinson, Shaun Stauffer, Gary Sulikowski, C David Weaver, Terunaga Nakagawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. NaNeurobiology of disease · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. AMPA receptor structure and auxiliary subunits.The Journal of physiology · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mechanisms of AMPA Receptor Endosomal Sorting.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caleigh M AzumayaDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Emily L DaysVanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology High Throughput Screening Core, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Paige N VinsonVanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology High Throughput Screening Core, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Shaun StaufferDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Gary SulikowskiDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
C David WeaverVanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology High Throughput Screening Core, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Terunaga NakagawaDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Vanderbilt University · USVanderbilt Health · US

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICS TRAINING PROGRAM AT VANDERBILTT32GM008320 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CHAZIN, WALTER J. · 1989 to 2023
$7.9M
Identifying molecules that modulate auxiliary factors of AMPA receptorsR21MH102546 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI NAKAGAWA, TERUNAGA, WEAVER, C DAVID · 2014 to 2015
$432k
GPU-Accelerated Parallel Computer for Drug Discovery ApplicationsS10OD020154 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, JARROD ANSON · 2015 to 2015
$225k
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008320NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH102546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AMPA receptors (AMPAR) are ligand gated ion channels critical for synaptic transmission and plasticity. Their dysfunction is implicated in a variety of psychiatric and neurological diseases ranging from major depressive disorder to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Attempting to potentiate or depress AMPAR activity is an inherently difficult balancing act between effective treatments and debilitating side effects. A newly explored strategy to target subsets of AMPARs in the central nervous system is to identify compounds that affect specific AMPAR-auxiliary subunit complexes. This exploits diverse spatio-temporal expression patterns of known AMPAR auxiliary subunits, providing means for designing brain region-selective compounds. Here we report a high-throughput screening-based pipeline that can identify compounds that are selective for GluA2-CNIH3 and GluA2-stargazin complexes. These compounds will help us build upon the growing library of AMPAR-auxiliary subunit specific inhibitors, which have thus far all been targeted to TARP γ-8. We used a cell-based assay combined with a voltage-sensitive dye (VSD) to identify changes in glutamate-gated cation flow across the membranes of HEK cells co-expressing GluA2 and an auxiliary subunit. We then used a calcium flux assay to further validate hits picked from the VSD assay. VU0612951 and VU0627849 are candidate compounds from the initial screen that were identified as negative and positive allosteric modulators (NAM and PAM), respectively. They both have lower IC50/EC50s on complexes containing stargazin and CNIH3 than GSG1L or the AMPAR alone. We have also identified a candidate compound, VU0539491, that has NAM activity in GluA2(R)-CNIH3 and GluA2(Q) complexes and PAM activity in GluA2(Q)-GSG1L complexes.

Indexed as

Biological TransportCalciumCalcium ChannelsElectrophysiologyHEK293 CellsHumansReceptors, AMPACalciumCalcium Channelsglutamate receptor ionotropic, AMPA 2Receptors, AMPA

Identifiers

PMID28358902
PMCPMC5373622
OpenAlexW2602877737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.