ArticlePloS one2017
Screening for AMPA receptor auxiliary subunit specific modulators.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Positive AMPA and Kainate Receptor Modulators and Their Therapeutic Potential in CNS Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Fluorescence-Based HTS Assays for Ion Channel Modulation in Drug Discovery Pipelines.ChemMedChem · 2024Review
- Modulatory mechanisms of TARP γ8-selective AMPA receptor therapeutics.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Diversity of AMPA Receptor Ligands: Chemotypes, Binding Modes, Mechanisms of Action, and Therapeutic Effects.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- Imaging of Transmembrane AMPA Receptor Regulatory Proteins by Positron Emission Tomography.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2022Article
- NaNeurobiology of disease · 2022Article
- Structure, Function, and Pharmacology of Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels.Pharmacological reviews · 2021Review
- AMPA receptor structure and auxiliary subunits.The Journal of physiology · 2021Review
- Targeting receptor complexes: a new dimension in drug discovery.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2020Review
- Characterizing the binding and function of TARP γ8-selective AMPA receptor modulators.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020Article
- Allosteric Modulation of Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors: An Outlook on New Therapeutic Approaches To Treat Central Nervous System Disorders.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2019Article
- Mechanisms of AMPA Receptor Endosomal Sorting.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
AMPA receptors (AMPAR) are ligand gated ion channels critical for synaptic transmission and plasticity. Their dysfunction is implicated in a variety of psychiatric and neurological diseases ranging from major depressive disorder to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Attempting to potentiate or depress AMPAR activity is an inherently difficult balancing act between effective treatments and debilitating side effects. A newly explored strategy to target subsets of AMPARs in the central nervous system is to identify compounds that affect specific AMPAR-auxiliary subunit complexes. This exploits diverse spatio-temporal expression patterns of known AMPAR auxiliary subunits, providing means for designing brain region-selective compounds. Here we report a high-throughput screening-based pipeline that can identify compounds that are selective for GluA2-CNIH3 and GluA2-stargazin complexes. These compounds will help us build upon the growing library of AMPAR-auxiliary subunit specific inhibitors, which have thus far all been targeted to TARP γ-8. We used a cell-based assay combined with a voltage-sensitive dye (VSD) to identify changes in glutamate-gated cation flow across the membranes of HEK cells co-expressing GluA2 and an auxiliary subunit. We then used a calcium flux assay to further validate hits picked from the VSD assay. VU0612951 and VU0627849 are candidate compounds from the initial screen that were identified as negative and positive allosteric modulators (NAM and PAM), respectively. They both have lower IC50/EC50s on complexes containing stargazin and CNIH3 than GSG1L or the AMPAR alone. We have also identified a candidate compound, VU0539491, that has NAM activity in GluA2(R)-CNIH3 and GluA2(Q) complexes and PAM activity in GluA2(Q)-GSG1L complexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.