Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28358649›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2017

Organizational Context and Female Faculty's Perception of the Climate for Women in Academic Medicine.

René Carapinha, Caitlin M McCracken, Erica T Warner, Emorcia V Hill, Joan Y Reede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. In Reply to Carvajal et al.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

René Carapinha1 Office for Diversity Inclusion and Community Partnership, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Caitlin M McCracken3 The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center , Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Erica T Warner1 Office for Diversity Inclusion and Community Partnership, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Emorcia V Hill1 Office for Diversity Inclusion and Community Partnership, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Joan Y Reede1 Office for Diversity Inclusion and Community Partnership, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USCommunity Partners · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGender inequalities in the careers of faculty in academic medicine could partially be attributed to an organizational climate that can exclude or be nonsupportive of women faculty. This study explores the climate for women faculty from a systems perspective at the organizational and individual levels based on the perceptions of women faculty. Race differences were also investigated. MATERIALS AND

methodsCross-sectional survey data from women faculty (N = 3127) at 13 purposively sampled medical schools and an institutional assessment of organizational characteristics were used. Organizational factors related to the climate for women were identified using bivariate statistics. The association between perceived climate for women and organizational characteristics, individual perceptions of the work environment and individual career, and personal characteristics with control variables were investigated using hierarchical linear regression models. Organizational effects by race/ethnicity were estimated using interaction terms.

resultsThe climate for women faculty varied across institutions and by classification as minority-serving institutions (MSIs). Respondent's report of existence of an office for women's affairs, trust in leadership, and satisfaction with mentoring were positively associated with the climate for women. Perceived workplace discrimination and work-family conflict were inversely associated with a positive climate. No race/ethnicity differences were observed in the multivariable analysis.

conclusionsThe climate for women faculty in academic medicine should not be regarded constant across organizations, specifically between MSIs and non-MSIs. Efforts to advance a positive climate for women could focus on improving trust in leadership, increasing support for structures/offices for women, and mitigating perceived discrimination and work-family conflict.

Indexed as

Career MobilityOrganizational CulturePerceptionCross-Sectional StudiesFaculty, MedicalFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionLeadershipMassachusettsMentorsPhysicians, WomenPrejudiceSchools, MedicalSexismSocial Perceptionacademic medicineintersectionalityminority serving institutionsorganizational climatewomen faculty

Identifiers

PMID28358649
PMCPMC5446611
OpenAlexW2600881524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.