ArticleNature protocols2017
Analyzing trapped protein complexes by Virotrap and SFINX.
Article in Nature protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ring finger protein 213 assembles into a sensor for ISGylated proteins with antimicrobial activity.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Recombinant extracellular vesicles as biological reference material for method development, data normalization and assessment of (pre-)analytical variables.Nature protocols · 2021Article
- CapturingFrontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Keeping in Touch with Type-III Secretion System Effectors: Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics to Study Effector-Host Protein-Protein Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Monitoring protein communities and their responses to therapeutics.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2020Review
- A protein-protein interaction map of the TNF-induced NF-κB signal transduction pathway.Scientific data · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The analysis of protein interaction networks is one of the key challenges in the study of biology. It connects genotypes to phenotypes, and disruption of such networks is associated with many pathologies. Virtually all the approaches to the study of protein complexes require cell lysis, a dramatic step that obliterates cellular integrity and profoundly affects protein interactions. This protocol starts with Virotrap, a novel approach that avoids the need for cell homogenization by fusing the protein of interest to the HIV-1 Gag protein, trapping protein complexes in virus-like particles. By using the straightforward filtering index (SFINX), which is a powerful and intuitive online tool (http://sfinx.ugent.be) that enables contaminant removal from candidate lists resulting from mass-spectrometry-based analysis, we provide a complete workflow for researchers interested in mammalian protein complexes. Given direct access to mass spectrometers, researchers can process up to 24 samples in 7 d.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.