ArticleScientific reports2017
Reactive Hyperemia Index in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis: Cross-sectional Data from a Cohort Study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training on Autonomic and Endothelial Function in Persons with Parkinson's Disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2024Trial
- The correlation between reactive hyperemia index and endothelial dysfunction markers in patients with hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Blood pressure variability, nocturnal heart rate variability and endothelial function predict recurrent cerebro-cardiovascular events following ischemic stroke.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Reactive Hyperemia Index Associated With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Under Treatment for Lifestyle Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2020Article
- Association between serum uric acid level and endothelial dysfunction in elderly individuals with untreated mild hypertension.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies suggested that the reactive hyperemia index (RHI) is a promising cardiovascular risk predictor. We aimed to evaluate clinical determinants of RHI and its association with circulating endothelial injury and cardiac markers in hemodialysis patients. Among 368 patients recruited, RHI was evaluated by peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) on a midweek nondialysis day. Clinical determinants of RHI were explored by multiple stepwise regression analysis and associations between RHI and circulating markers were evaluated by general linear models. The major cause of a failed PAT test was poor signal (82.1%). Intraclass correlation coefficient for reproducibility evaluation was 0.74. Multiple regression analysis showed traditional clinical factors only explained 7% of the variance of natural logarithm RHI (LnRHI) in the patients. In association analyses, LnRHI showed significant positive associations with Von Willebrand factor (vWF) (p = 0.04) and tissue factor (p = 0.047). It also associated positively with troponins (p ≤ 0.02 for both). In conclusion, performance of the PAT test was acceptable in dialysis patients and traditional clinical variables had very limited influence on RHI in these subjects. Among a panel of conventional endothelial injury markers, RHI showed very modest associations with only vWF and tissue factor. RHI associated positively with troponins in the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.