ArticleNature genetics2017
Celebrating parasites.
Article in Nature genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eras of bioinformatics technologies from command-line interfaces to artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Ten simple rules for recognizing data and software contributions in hiring, promotion, and tenure.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Creating and troubleshooting microscopy analysis workflows: Common challenges and common solutions.Journal of microscopy · 2024Article
- Creating and troubleshooting microscopy analysis workflows: common challenges and common solutions.ArXiv · 2024Article
- A field guide to cultivating computational biology.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- A Large-Scale COVID-19 Twitter Chatter Dataset for Open Scientific Research-An International Collaboration.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Sharing biological data: why, when, and how.FEBS letters · 2021Article
- A research parasite's perspective on establishing a baseline to avoid errors in secondary analyses.GigaScience · 2021Article
- Responsible, practical genomic data sharing that accelerates research.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2020Review
- Article
- Article
- Analysis of data dictionary formats of HIV clinical trials.PloS one · 2020Article
- Five years of Scientific Data.Scientific data · 2019Article
- Translational bioinformatics in mental health: open access data sources and computational biomarker discovery.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Preparing next-generation scientists for biomedical big data: artificial intelligence approaches.Personalized medicine · 2019Review
- Ten quick tips for biocuration.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Leveraging Big Data to Transform Drug Discovery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019Article
- A parasite's perspective on data sharing.GigaScience · 2018Article
- Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment onData Sharing.2016
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.