Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28357725›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2017

Ventricular pacing site separation by cardiac computed tomography: validation for the prediction of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

S Modi, Raymond Yee, David Scholl, John Stirrat, Jorge A Wong, Carmen Lydell, Vamshi Kotha, Lorne J Gula, Allan C Skanes, Peter Leong-Sit and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

S ModiDivision of Cardiology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Canada.
Raymond YeeDivision of Cardiology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Canada.
David SchollRobarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
John StirratRobarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Jorge A WongDivision of Cardiology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Canada.
Carmen LydellStephenson Cardiac Imaging Centre, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Vamshi KothaStephenson Cardiac Imaging Centre, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Lorne J GulaDivision of Cardiology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Canada.
Allan C SkanesDivision of Cardiology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Canada.
Peter Leong-SitDivision of Cardiology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Canada.
David McCartyDivision of Cardiology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Canada.
Maria DrangovaRobarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
James A WhiteStephenson Cardiac Imaging Centre, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada. jawhit@ucalgary.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) fails to provide benefit in up to one-third of patients. Maximizing the geographic separation of right and left ventricular pacing lead sites has been suggested as one way to improve response. Cardiac CT provides an opportunity to explore 3-dimensional inter-lead distance (ILD) measures for the prediction of CRT response. The objective of this study was to investigate associations between standardized measures of ILD by cardiac CT and echocardiographic response to CRT. Forty-two consecutive patients undergoing CRT had serial clinical and echocardiographic evaluations performed in addition to a post-procedural cardiac-gated CT with blinded measurement of direct and circumferential (via the myocardium) ILD measures. Clinical response to CRT, the primary clinical outcome, was defined as a ≥15% reduction in LVESV using echocardiography at 6-months. The mean age and ejection fraction was 63.6 ± 8.9 years and 25.2 ± 7.8%, respectively. The primary outcome occurred in 35 of 42 patients (83%). Both direct and circumferential CT-based ILD measures were associated with the primary outcome by univariate analysis. Receiver Operator Characteristic analysis identified Circumferential ILD to have the strongest predictive accuracy (AUC 0.78). Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of CT-derived ILD measures was excellent. Circumferential ILD measures on cardiac CT are predictive of clinical response to CRT. Incorporation of these measures into the selection of optimal pacing targets, particularly from pre-procedural CT coronary vein imaging may be of therapeutic benefit and warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy DevicesMultidetector Computed TomographyAgedCardiac Resynchronization TherapyEchocardiographyEquipment DesignFemaleHeart FailureHeart VentriclesHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsCardiac computed tomographyCardiac failureCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)CRT responseInter-lead distanceLead separationLeft ventricular lead

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.