Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28357569›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of hematology2017

Leukemic stem cells: identification and clinical application.

Diana Hanekamp, Jacqueline Cloos, Gerrit Jan Schuurhuis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of hematology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diana HanekampDepartment of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline CloosDepartment of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.cloos@vumc.nl.
Gerrit Jan SchuurhuisDepartment of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leukemic stem cells (LSCs) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represent a low-frequency subpopulation of leukemia cells that possess stem cell properties distinct from the bulk leukemia cells, including self-renewal capacity and drug resistance. Due to these properties, LSCs are supposed to facilitate the development of relapse. The existence of LSCs is demonstrated by the ability to engraft and initiate human AML in immune-compromised mouse models. Although several lines of evidence suggest the complex heterogeneity of phenotypes displayed by LSC, many studies consider the CD34+/CD38- compartment as the most relevant. To increase the understanding of the true LSC, techniques such as multicolor flow cytometry, side-population assay and ALDH assay are utilized in many laboratories and could aid in this. A better understanding of different LSC phenotypes is necessary to enhance risk group classification, guide clinical decision-making and to identify new therapeutic targets. These efforts to eliminate LSC should ultimately improve the dismal AML outcome by preventing relapse development.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteNeoplastic Stem CellsADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1AnimalsAntigens, CD34Biomarkers, TumorFlow CytometryHumansImmunocompromised HostMiceNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1Antigens, CD34Biomarkers, TumorAcute myeloid leukemiaFlow cytometryImmunophenotypicLeukemic stem cells

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.