Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28357504›Full record

Trial reportDiabetologia2017

Effect of simultaneous vaccination with H1N1 and GAD-alum on GAD

Beatriz Tavira, Mikael Cheramy, Stina Axelsson, Linda Åkerman, Johnny Ludvigsson, Rosaura Casas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00723411 (A Phase III, 3-Arm, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Investigate the Impact of Diamyd on the Progression of Diabetes in Patients Newly Diagnosed With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00723411 phase3terminatednot on this map

A Phase III, 3-Arm, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Investigate the Impact of Diamyd on the Progression of Diabetes in Patients Newly Diagnosed With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (EU)

TypeinterventionalSponsorDiamyd Therapeutics ABRan2008 to 2011Enrolled334ConditionsType 1 Diabetes MellitusArmsrhGAD65, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Vaccine for Diabetes-Where Do We Stand?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. HLA variation and disease.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Beatriz TaviraDivision of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden. beatriz.tavira.iglesias@liu.se.
Mikael CheramyDivision of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Stina AxelssonDivision of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Linda ÅkermanDivision of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Johnny LudvigssonDivision of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Rosaura CasasDivision of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Linköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisA European Phase III trial of GAD formulated with aluminium hydroxide (GAD-alum) failed to reach its primary endpoint (preservation of stimulated C-peptide secretion from baseline to 15 months in type 1 diabetes patients), but subgroup analysis showed a clinical effect when participants from Nordic countries were excluded, raising concern as to whether the mass vaccination of the Swedish and Finnish populations with the Pandemrix influenza vaccine could have influenced the study outcomes. In the current study, we aimed to assess whether Pandemrix vaccination affects the specific immune responses induced by GAD-alum and the C-peptide response.

methodsIn this secondary analysis, we analysed data acquired from the Swedish participants in the Phase III GAD-alum trial who received subcutaneous GAD-alum vaccination (two doses, n = 43; four doses, n = 46) or placebo (n = 48). GAD autoantibodies (GADA) and H1N1 autoantibodies, GAD

resultsGADA levels at 15 months were associated with the relative time between GAD-alum and Pandemrix administration in participants who received two doses of the GAD-alum vaccine (p = 0.015, r = 0.4). Both in participants treated with two doses and four doses of GAD-alum, GADA levels were higher when the relative time between vaccines was ≥210 days (p < 0.05). In the group that received two doses of GAD-alum, levels of several GAD CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationIn individuals who received two doses of GAD-alum, receiving the Pandemrix vaccine closer to the first GAD-alum injection, i.e. <150 days, seemed to affect both GAD

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00723411.

Indexed as

Influenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeAdolescentAlum CompoundsAutoantibodiesChildC-PeptideCytokinesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Double-Blind MethodFemaleFinlandGlutamate DecarboxylaseHemagglutininsHumansImmune SystemInfluenza, HumanAlum Compoundsaluminum sulfateAutoantibodiesC-PeptideCytokinesGlutamate DecarboxylaseHemagglutininsInfluenza VaccinesInsulinpandemrixChildrenGADH1N1Immune interventionType 1 diabetesVaccine

Identifiers

PMID28357504
PMCPMC5487599
OpenAlexW2598487361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.