Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28357155›Full record

ArticlePLoS currents2017

Analytical and Clinical Validity Study of FirstStepDx PLUS: A Chromosomal Microarray Optimized for Patients with Neurodevelopmental Conditions.

Charles Hensel, Rena Vanzo, Megan Martin, Sean Dixon, Christophe Lambert, Brynn Levy, Lesa Nelson, Andy Peiffer, Karen S Ho, Patricia Rushton and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS currents, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Limitations of exome sequencing in detecting rare and undiagnosed diseases.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Charles HenselLineagen, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Rena VanzoClinical Genetic Services, Lineagen, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Megan MartinLineagen, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Sean DixonOperations, Lineagen, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Christophe LambertDepartment of Internal Medicine, Center for Global Health, Division of Translational Informatics, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Brynn LevyDepartment of Pathology & Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Lesa NelsonAffiliated Genetics Laboratory, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Andy PeifferDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; Lineagen, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Karen S HoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; Lineagen, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Patricia RushtonLineagen, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Moises SerranoLineagen, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Sarah SouthARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; 23andMe, Inc., Mountain View, California, USA.
Kenneth WardAffiliated Genetics Laboratory, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Edward WassmanLineagen, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Lineage Cell Therapeutics (United States) · USARUP Laboratories (United States) · USCenter for Global Health · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is recognized as the first-tier test in the genetic evaluation of children with developmental delays, intellectual disabilities, congenital anomalies and autism spectrum disorders of unknown etiology. ARRAY

designTo optimize detection of clinically relevant copy number variants associated with these conditions, we designed a whole-genome microarray, FirstStep RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Clinical testing of this patient population is validated on DNA from either non-invasive buccal swabs or traditional blood samples. In this report we provide data demonstrating the analytic and clinical validity of FSDX and provide an overview of results from the first 7,570 consecutive patients tested clinically. We further demonstrate that buccal sampling is an effective method of obtaining DNA samples, which may provide improved results compared to traditional blood sampling for patients with neurodevelopmental disorders who exhibit somatic mosaicism.

Identifiers

PMID28357155
PMCPMC5346028
OpenAlexW2951665893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.