Growth of Infants with Intestinal Failure or Feeding Intolerance Does Not Follow Standard Growth Curves.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Retrospective review of growth in pediatric intestinal failure after weaning from parenteral nutrition.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
   Article
2. Dilemmas in feeding infants with intestinal failure: a neonatologist's perspective.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
   Review
3. Monitoring of long-term parenteral nutrition in children with intestinal failure.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2019
   Review
4. [Growth of Children with Neonatal Short Bowel Syndrome: Its Relationship to Gestational Age].Acta gastroenterologica Latinoamericana
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.