Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28356887›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2016

Pre-Test and Post-Test Applications to Shape the Education of Phlebotomists in A Quality Management Program: An Experience in a Training Hospital.

Güzin Aykal, Mustafa Keşapli, Özgür Aydin, Hatice Esen, Ayşenur Yeğin, Faruk Güngör, Necat Yilmaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. From pre-test and post-test probabilities to medical decision making.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Laboratory Information System - Where are we Today?Journal of medical biochemistry · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Patient and Sample Identification. Out of the Maze?Journal of medical biochemistry · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Güzin AykalCentral Laboratories of Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Mustafa KeşapliEmergency Department of Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Özgür AydinClinical Biochemistry, Batman Maternity and Children's Hospital, Batman, Turkey.
Hatice EsenQuality Management Department of Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Ayşenur YeğinCentral Laboratories of Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Faruk GüngörEmergency Department of Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Necat YilmazCentral Laboratories of Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter the introduction of modern laboratory instruments and information systems, preanalytic phase is the new field of battle. Errors in preanalytical phase account for approximately half of total errors in clinical laboratory. The objective of this study was to share an experience of an education program that was believed to be successful in decreasing the number of rejected samples received from the Emergency Department (ED).

methodsAn education program about laboratory procedures, quality requirements in the laboratory, patient and health-care worker safety was planned by the quality team to be performed on 36 people who were responsible for sample collection in the ED. A questionary which included 11 questions about the preanalytic phase was applied to all the attendees before and after training. The number of rejected samples per million was discovered with right proportion account over the number of accepted and rejected samples to laboratory after and before the training period.

resultsMost of the attendees were nurses (n: 22/55%), with over 12 years of experience in general and 2-4 years experience in the ED. Knowledge level of the attendees was calculated before training as 58.9% and after training as 91.8%. While the total rate of sample rejection before training was 2.35% (sigma value 3.37-3.50), the rate after training was 1.56% (sigma value 3.62-3.75).

conclusionsIncreasing the knowledge of staff has a direct positive impact on the preanalytic phase. The application of a pre-test was observed to be a feasible tool to shape group specific education programs.

Indexed as

knowledge managementpreanalytic errorquality management

Identifiers

PMID28356887
PMCPMC5346814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.