Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28356519›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Structural reconstruction of protein ancestry.

Romain Rouet, David B Langley, Peter Schofield, Mary Christie, Brendan Roome, Benjamin T Porebski, Ashley M Buckle, Ben E Clifton, Colin J Jackson, Daniela Stock and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Romain RouetGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4210-9613
David B LangleyGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
Peter SchofieldGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
Mary ChristieGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
Brendan RoomeGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
Benjamin T PorebskiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Ashley M BuckleDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2943-9044
Ben E CliftonResearch School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Colin J JacksonResearch School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Daniela StockFaculty of Medicine, St. Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
Daniel ChristGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; d.christ@garvan.org.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ancestral protein reconstruction allows the resurrection and characterization of ancient proteins based on computational analyses of sequences of modern-day proteins. Unfortunately, many protein families are highly divergent and not suitable for sequence-based reconstruction approaches. This limitation is exemplified by the antigen receptors of jawed vertebrates (B- and T-cell receptors), heterodimers formed by pairs of Ig domains. These receptors are believed to have evolved from an extinct homodimeric ancestor through a process of gene duplication and diversification; however molecular evidence has so far remained elusive. Here, we use a structural approach and laboratory evolution to reconstruct such molecules and characterize their interaction with antigen. High-resolution crystal structures of reconstructed homodimeric receptors in complex with hen-egg white lysozyme demonstrate how nanomolar affinity binding of asymmetrical antigen is enabled through selective recruitment and structural plasticity within the receptor-binding site. Our results provide structural evidence in support of long-held theories concerning the evolution of antigen receptors, and provide a blueprint for the experimental reconstruction of protein ancestry in the absence of phylogenetic evidence.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyAnimalsCrystallography, X-RayImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsImmunoglobulin kappa-ChainsMuramidaseReceptors, Polymeric ImmunoglobulinVertebrateshen egg lysozymeImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsImmunoglobulin kappa-ChainsMuramidaseReceptors, Polymeric Immunoglobulinantibodydirected evolutionhomodimerprotein evolutionprotein structure

Identifiers

PMID28356519
PMCPMC5393204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.