Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28356479›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017

Dynamical signatures of isometric force control as a function of age, expertise, and task constraints.

Solveig Vieluf, Rita Sleimen-Malkoun, Claudia Voelcker-Rehage, Viktor Jirsa, Eva-Maria Reuter, Ben Godde, Jean-Jacques Temprado, Raoul Huys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Solveig VielufInstitute of Sports Medicine, University of Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany.
Rita Sleimen-MalkounAix-Marseille Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut des Sciences du Mouvement, Marseille, France.
Claudia Voelcker-RehageJacobs Center on Lifelong Learning and Institutional Change, Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany.
Viktor JirsaAix Marseille Université, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France.
Eva-Maria ReuterJacobs Center on Lifelong Learning and Institutional Change, Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6745-964X
Ben GoddeJacobs Center on Lifelong Learning and Institutional Change, Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany.
Jean-Jacques TempradoAix-Marseille Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut des Sciences du Mouvement, Marseille, France.
Raoul HuysUniversité Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, CNRS, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition UMR 5549, Toulouse, France raoul.huys@cnrs.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From the conceptual and methodological framework of the dynamical systems approach, force control results from complex interactions of various subsystems yielding observable behavioral fluctuations, which comprise both deterministic (predictable) and stochastic (noise-like) dynamical components. Here, we investigated these components contributing to the observed variability in force control in groups of participants differing in age and expertise level. To this aim, young (18-25 yr) as well as late middle-aged (55-65 yr) novices and experts (precision mechanics) performed a force maintenance and a force modulation task. Results showed that whereas the amplitude of force variability did not differ across groups in the maintenance tasks, in the modulation task it was higher for late middle-aged novices than for experts and higher for both these groups than for young participants. Within both tasks and for all groups, stochastic fluctuations were lowest where the deterministic influence was smallest. However, although all groups showed similar dynamics underlying force control in the maintenance task, a group effect was found for deterministic and stochastic fluctuations in the modulation task. The latter findings imply that both components were involved in the observed group differences in the variability of force fluctuations in the modulation task. These findings suggest that between groups the general characteristics of the dynamics do not differ in either task and that force control is more affected by age than by expertise. However, expertise seems to counteract some of the age effects.

Indexed as

Isometric ContractionMotor SkillsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsFemaleHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, Skeletalagingdrift-diffusion coefficientsdynamicsisometric force controllong-term practice

Identifiers

PMID28356479
PMCPMC5494366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.