Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28356414›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2017

Prospective Evaluation of Light Scatter Technology Paired with Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization

Sandra Montgomery, Kiana Roman, Lan Ngyuen, Ana Maria Cardenas, James Knox, Andrew P Tomaras, Erin H Graf

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Accuracy of molecular diagnostic techniques in patients with a confirmed urine culture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Modern Tools for Rapid Diagnostics of Antimicrobial Resistance.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Rapid Susceptibility Testing Methods.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra MontgomeryChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Infectious Disease Diagnostics Laboratory, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kiana RomanChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Infectious Disease Diagnostics Laboratory, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lan NgyuenChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Infectious Disease Diagnostics Laboratory, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ana Maria CardenasChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Infectious Disease Diagnostics Laboratory, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
James KnoxChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Infectious Disease Diagnostics Laboratory, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Andrew P TomarasBacterioScan, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Erin H GrafChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Infectious Disease Diagnostics Laboratory, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA grafe@email.chop.edu.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary tract infections are one of the most common reasons for health care visits. Diagnosis and optimal treatment often require a urine culture, which takes an average of 1.5 to 2 days from urine collection to results, delaying optimal therapy. Faster, but accurate, alternatives are needed. Light scatter technology has been proposed for several years as a rapid screening tool, whereby negative specimens are excluded from culture. A commercially available light scatter device, BacterioScan 216Dx (BacterioScan, Inc.), has recently been advertised for this application. Paired use of mass spectrometry (MS) for bacterial identification and automated-system-based susceptibility testing straight from the light scatter suspension might provide dramatic improvement in times to a result. The present study prospectively evaluated the BacterioScan device, with culture as the reference standard. Positive light scatter specimens were used for downstream rapid matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) MS organism identification and automated-system-based antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Prospective evaluation of 439 urine samples showed a sensitivity of 96.5%, a specificity of 71.4%, and positive and negative predictive values of 45.1% and 98.8%, respectively. MALDI-TOF MS analysis of the suspension after density-based selection yielded a sensitivity of 72.1% and a specificity of 96.9%. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the samples identified by MALDI-TOF MS produced an overall categorical agreement of 99.2%. Given the high sensitivity and negative predictive value of results obtained, BacterioScan 216Dx is a reasonable approach for urine screening and might produce negative results in as few as 3 h, with no downstream workup. Paired rapid identification and susceptibility testing might be useful when MALDI-TOF MS results in an organism identification, and it might decrease the time to a result by more than 24 h.

Indexed as

AdolescentBacteriological TechniquesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationUrinary Tract Infectionsmass spectrometrysusceptibility testingurinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID28356414
PMCPMC5442536
OpenAlexW2601542099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.