Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28356325›Full record

SynthesisJournal of epidemiology and community health2017

Return on investment of public health interventions: a systematic review.

Rebecca Masters, Elspeth Anwar, Brendan Collins, Richard Cookson, Simon Capewell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07461415 (CONNECT-HTN Trial - Coaching and Navigation by CHWs Through Telehealth for High-risk Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 183 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
183citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07461415 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

CONNECT-HTN Trial - Coaching and Navigation by CHWs Through Telehealth for High-risk Hypertension

TypeinterventionalSponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRan2026 to 2029Enrolled3,620ConditionsHypertensionArmsCONNECT-HTN, Standard ED management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

183 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Return on investment of fracture liaison services: a systematic review and analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Community Guide Methods for Systematic Reviews of Economic Evidence.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Testing a Population-Based Outreach Intervention for Ovarian Cancer Survivors to Encourage their Close Relatives to Consider Genetic Counseling.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Sustaining Health Promotion in Australian Supermarkets: Qualitative Perspectives From the Reach for the Stars Programme.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

123 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca MastersNorth Wales Local Public Health Team, Public Health Wales, Mold, Flintshire, UK.
Elspeth AnwarDepartment of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, UK.
Brendan CollinsDepartment of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, UK.
Richard CooksonCentre for Health Economics, University of York, UK.
Simon CapewellDepartment of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Department of Health SRF-2013-06-015Medical Research Council G0900847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic sector austerity measures in many high-income countries mean that public health budgets are reducing year on year. To help inform the potential impact of these proposed disinvestments in public health, we set out to determine the return on investment (ROI) from a range of existing public health interventions.

methodsWe conducted systematic searches on all relevant databases (including MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL; AMED; PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus) to identify studies that calculated a ROI or cost-benefit ratio (CBR) for public health interventions in high-income countries.

resultsWe identified 2957 titles, and included 52 studies. The median ROI for public health interventions was 14.3 to 1, and median CBR was 8.3. The median ROI for all 29 local public health interventions was 4.1 to 1, and median CBR was 10.3. Even larger benefits were reported in 28 studies analysing nationwide public health interventions; the median ROI was 27.2, and median CBR was 17.5.

conclusionsThis systematic review suggests that local and national public health interventions are highly cost-saving. Cuts to public health budgets in high income countries therefore represent a false economy, and are likely to generate billions of pounds of additional costs to health services and the wider economy.

Indexed as

Health PromotionPublic HealthEconomic evaluationECONOMICSHealth inequalitiesPUBLIC HEALTHPUBLIC HEALTH POLICY

Identifiers

PMID28356325
PMCPMC5537512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.