Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28356133›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Abdominal massage for neurogenic bowel dysfunction in people with multiple sclerosis (AMBER - Abdominal Massage for Bowel Dysfunction Effectiveness Research): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Doreen McClurg, Kirsteen Goodman, Suzanne Hagen, Fional Harris, Sean Treweek, Anton Emmanuel, Christine Norton, Maureen Coggrave, Selina Doran, John Norrie and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Doreen McClurgNMAHP RU, Glasgow Caledonian University, A603 Govan Mbeki Building, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK. Doreen.mcclurg@gcu.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2872-1702
Kirsteen GoodmanNMAHP RU, Glasgow Caledonian University, A603 Govan Mbeki Building, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK.
Suzanne HagenNMAHP RU, Glasgow Caledonian University, A603 Govan Mbeki Building, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK.
Fional HarrisNMAHP RU, Stirling University, Stirling, UK.
Sean TreweekCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT) Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Anton EmmanuelUniversity College Hospital, University College London, London, UK.
Christine NortonKing's College London, London University College, London, UK.
Maureen CoggraveKing's College London, London University College, London, UK.
Selina DoranNMAHP RU, Glasgow Caledonian University, A603 Govan Mbeki Building, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK.
John NorrieCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT) Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Peter DonnanTayside Clinical Trials Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Helen MasonYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Sarkis ManoukianYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Glasgow Caledonian University · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1Chief Scientist Office NMAHP2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a life-long condition primarily affecting younger adults. Neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) occurs in 50-80% of these patients and is the term used to describe constipation and faecal incontinence, which often co-exist. Data from a pilot study suggested feasibility of using abdominal massage for the relief of constipation, but the effectiveness remains uncertain. METHODS/

designThis is a multi-centred patient randomised superiority trial comparing an experimental strategy of once daily abdominal massage for 6 weeks against a control strategy of no massage in people with MS who have stated that their constipation is bothersome. The primary outcome is the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score at 24 weeks. Both groups will receive optimised advice plus the MS Society booklet on bowel management in MS, and will continue to receive usual care. Participants and their clinicians will not be blinded to the allocated intervention. Outcome measures are primarily self-reported and submitted anonymously. Central trial staff who will manage and analyse the trial data will be unaware of participant allocations. Analysis will follow intention-to-treat principles. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic randomised controlled trial will demonstrate if abdominal massage is an effective, cost-effective and viable addition to the treatment of NBD in people with MS.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN85007023 . Registered on 10 June 2014.

Indexed as

DefecationAbdomenClinical ProtocolsConstipationFemaleHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisIntestinesMaleMassageMultiple SclerosisNeurogenic BowelRecovery of FunctionResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsAbdominal massageConstipationMultiple sclerosisRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID28356133
PMCPMC5372315
OpenAlexW2598801818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.