Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28355625›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2017

Predicting rhesus monkey eye movements during natural-image search.

Mark A Segraves, Emory Kuo, Sara Caddigan, Emily A Berthiaume, Konrad P Kording

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark A SegravesDepartment of Neurobiology, Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Emory KuoDepartment of Neurobiology, Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Sara CaddiganDepartment of Neurobiology, Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Emily A BerthiaumeDepartment of Neurobiology, Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Konrad P KordingDepartments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Fixation Choice While Searching Natural ScenesR01EY021579 · NEI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI KORDING, KONRAD P., SEGRAVES, MARK A · 2012 to 2019
$2.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are three prominent factors that can predict human visual-search behavior in natural scenes: the distinctiveness of a location (salience), similarity to the target (relevance), and features of the environment that predict where the object might be (context). We do not currently know how well these factors are able to predict macaque visual search, which matters because it is arguably the most popular model for asking how the brain controls eye movements. Here we trained monkeys to perform the pedestrian search task previously used for human subjects. Salience, relevance, and context models were all predictive of monkey eye fixations and jointly about as precise as for humans. We attempted to disrupt the influence of scene context on search by testing the monkeys with an inverted set of the same images. Surprisingly, the monkeys were able to locate the pedestrian at a rate similar to that for upright images. The best predictions of monkey fixations in searching inverted images were obtained by rotating the results of the model predictions for the original image. The fact that the same models can predict human and monkey search behavior suggests that the monkey can be used as a good model for understanding how the human brain enables natural-scene search.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnvironmentEye MovementsFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMacaca mulattaModels, TheoreticalPattern Recognition, Visual

Identifiers

PMID28355625
PMCPMC5373813
OpenAlexW2597927453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.