Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28355551›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2017

Unraveling the Receptor-Ligand Interactions between Bladder Cancer Cells and the Endothelium Using AFM.

Vinoth Sundar Rajan, Valérie M Laurent, Claude Verdier, Alain Duperray

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Research progress of MUC1 in genitourinary cancers.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vinoth Sundar RajanINSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, IAB, Grenoble, France; University Grenoble Alpes, IAB, Grenoble, France.
Valérie M LaurentCNRS UMR 5588, LIPhy, Grenoble, France; University Grenoble Alpes, LIPhy, Grenoble, France.
Claude VerdierCNRS UMR 5588, LIPhy, Grenoble, France; University Grenoble Alpes, LIPhy, Grenoble, France.
Alain DuperrayINSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, IAB, Grenoble, France; University Grenoble Alpes, IAB, Grenoble, France. Electronic address: alain.duperray@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr.
Université Grenoble Alpes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adhesion of cancer cells to endothelial cells is a key step in cancer metastasis; therefore, identifying the key molecules involved during this process promises to aid in efforts to block the metastatic cascade. We have previously shown that intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expressed by endothelial cells is involved in the interactions of bladder cancer cells (BCs) with the endothelium. However, the ICAM-1 ligands have never been investigated. In this study, we combined adhesion assays and atomic force microscopy (AFM) to identify the ligands involved and to quantify the forces relevant in such interactions. We report the expression of MUC1 and CD43 on BCs, and demonstrate that these ligands interact with ICAM-1 to mediate cancer cell-endothelial cell adhesion in the case of the more invasive BCs. This was achieved with the use of adhesion assays, which showed a strong decrease in the attachment of BCs to endothelial cells when MUC1 and CD43 were blocked by antibodies. In addition, AFM measurements showed a similar decrease, by up to 70%, in the number of rupture events that occurred when MUC1 and CD43 were blocked. When we applied a Gaussian mixture model to the AFM data, we observed a distinct force range for receptor-ligand bonds, which allowed us to precisely identify the interactions of ICAM-1 with MUC1 or CD43. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of the rupture events suggested that CD43 is strongly connected to the cytoskeleton and that its interaction with ICAM-1 mainly corresponds to force ramps followed by sudden jumps. In contrast, MUC1 seems to be weakly connected to the cytoskeleton, as its interactions with ICAM-1 are mainly associated with the formation of tethers. This analysis is quite promising and may also be applied to other types of cancer cells.

Indexed as

Microscopy, Atomic ForceBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCell AdhesionCell Line, TumorCytoskeletonEndotheliumHumansIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1LeukosialinLigandsMucin-1Neoplasm MetastasisProtein BindingThiazolidinesUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1latrunculin ALeukosialinLigandsMucin-1Thiazolidines

Identifiers

PMID28355551
PMCPMC5375142
OpenAlexW2602552336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.