ArticleBiophysical journal2017
Unraveling the Receptor-Ligand Interactions between Bladder Cancer Cells and the Endothelium Using AFM.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single Cell Mechanics in Disease Progression.Small science · 2026Review
- Cancer cells impact the microrheology of endothelial cells during physical contact or through paracrine signalling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Research progress of MUC1 in genitourinary cancers.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2024Review
- Analyzing atomic force microscopy images of virus-like particles by expectation-maximization.NPJ vaccines · 2024Article
- Construction of endothelial cell signatures for predicting the diagnosis, prognosis and immunotherapy response of bladder cancer via machine learning.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- The Bladder Tumor Microenvironment Components That Modulate the Tumor and Impact Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Few-shot deep learning for AFM force curve characterization of single-molecule interactions.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Efficient deformation mechanisms enable invasive cancer cells to migrate faster in 3D collagen networks.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Tissue mechanics modulate PCNP expression in oral squamous cell carcinomas with different differentiation.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Complex Conformational Dynamics of the Heart Failure-Associated Pre-miRNA-377 Hairpin Revealed by Single-Molecule Optical Tweezers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Melanoma cells can be eliminated by sialylated CD43 × CD3 bispecific T cell engager formats in vitro and in vivo.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2021Article
- Electrospun Biomaterials from Chitosan Blends Applied as Scaffold for Tissue Regeneration.Polymers · 2021Article
- Quality control of direct cell-mineral adhesion measurements in air and liquid using inverse AFM imaging.RSC advances · 2021Article
- Atomic Force Microscopy Meets Biophysics, Bioengineering, Chemistry, and Materials Science.ChemSusChem · 2019Review
- Epigenetics of Bladder Cancer: Where Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets Meet.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- Mechanosensitivity of Cancer Cells in Contact with Soft Substrates Using AFM.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adhesion of cancer cells to endothelial cells is a key step in cancer metastasis; therefore, identifying the key molecules involved during this process promises to aid in efforts to block the metastatic cascade. We have previously shown that intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expressed by endothelial cells is involved in the interactions of bladder cancer cells (BCs) with the endothelium. However, the ICAM-1 ligands have never been investigated. In this study, we combined adhesion assays and atomic force microscopy (AFM) to identify the ligands involved and to quantify the forces relevant in such interactions. We report the expression of MUC1 and CD43 on BCs, and demonstrate that these ligands interact with ICAM-1 to mediate cancer cell-endothelial cell adhesion in the case of the more invasive BCs. This was achieved with the use of adhesion assays, which showed a strong decrease in the attachment of BCs to endothelial cells when MUC1 and CD43 were blocked by antibodies. In addition, AFM measurements showed a similar decrease, by up to 70%, in the number of rupture events that occurred when MUC1 and CD43 were blocked. When we applied a Gaussian mixture model to the AFM data, we observed a distinct force range for receptor-ligand bonds, which allowed us to precisely identify the interactions of ICAM-1 with MUC1 or CD43. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of the rupture events suggested that CD43 is strongly connected to the cytoskeleton and that its interaction with ICAM-1 mainly corresponds to force ramps followed by sudden jumps. In contrast, MUC1 seems to be weakly connected to the cytoskeleton, as its interactions with ICAM-1 are mainly associated with the formation of tethers. This analysis is quite promising and may also be applied to other types of cancer cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.