Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28355538›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2017

Understanding the Relative Flexibility of RNA and DNA Duplexes: Stretching and Twist-Stretch Coupling.

Lei Bao, Xi Zhang, Ya-Zhou Shi, Yuan-Yan Wu, Zhi-Jie Tan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lei BaoCenter for Theoretical Physics and Key Laboratory of Artificial Micro- & Nano-structures of Ministry of Education, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xi ZhangCenter for Theoretical Physics and Key Laboratory of Artificial Micro- & Nano-structures of Ministry of Education, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Ya-Zhou ShiCenter for Theoretical Physics and Key Laboratory of Artificial Micro- & Nano-structures of Ministry of Education, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Research Center of Nonlinear Science, School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan, China.
Yuan-Yan WuCenter for Theoretical Physics and Key Laboratory of Artificial Micro- & Nano-structures of Ministry of Education, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; College of Physical Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Zhi-Jie TanCenter for Theoretical Physics and Key Laboratory of Artificial Micro- & Nano-structures of Ministry of Education, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. Electronic address: zjtan@whu.edu.cn.
Wuhan University · CNYangzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The flexibility of double-stranded (ds) RNA and dsDNA is crucial for their biological functions. Recent experiments have shown that the flexibility of dsRNA and dsDNA can be distinctively different in the aspects of stretching and twist-stretch coupling. Although various studies have been performed to understand the flexibility of dsRNA and dsDNA, there is still a lack of deep understanding of the distinctive differences in the flexibility of dsRNA and dsDNA helices as pertains to their stretching and twist-stretch coupling. In this work, we have explored the relative flexibility in stretching and twist-stretch coupling between dsRNA and dsDNA by all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. The calculated stretch modulus and twist-stretch coupling are in good accordance with the existing experiments. Our analyses show that the differences in stretching and twist-stretch coupling between dsRNA and dsDNA helices are mainly attributed to their different (A- and B-form) helical structures. Stronger basepair inclination and slide in dsRNA is responsible for the apparently weaker stretching rigidity versus that of dsDNA, and the opposite twist-stretch coupling for dsRNA and dsDNA is also attributed to the stronger basepair inclination in dsRNA than in dsDNA. Our calculated macroscopic elastic parameters and microscopic analyses are tested and validated by different force fields for both dsRNA and dsDNA.

Indexed as

Mechanical PhenomenaBase PairingBase SequenceBiomechanical PhenomenaDNAMolecular Dynamics SimulationRNA, Double-StrandedDNARNA, Double-Stranded

Identifiers

PMID28355538
PMCPMC5376108
OpenAlexW2600989122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.