Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28355537›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2017

Ephemeral Protein Binding to DNA Shapes Stable Nuclear Bodies and Chromatin Domains.

Chris A Brackley, Benno Liebchen, Davide Michieletto, Francois Mouvet, Peter R Cook, Davide Marenduzzo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Investigating Phase Separation in Genome Folding via Multiscale Computational Modeling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Role of RNA in genome folding: It's all about affinity.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Regulation of Chromatin Architecture by Transcription Factor Binding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chris A BrackleySUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Benno LiebchenSUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Davide MichielettoSUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Francois MouvetSUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Peter R CookSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Davide MarenduzzoSUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Electronic address: dmarendu@ph.ed.ac.uk.
University of Edinburgh · GBScottish Universities Physics Alliance · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence microscopy reveals that the contents of many (membrane-free) nuclear bodies exchange rapidly with the soluble pool while the underlying structure persists; such observations await a satisfactory biophysical explanation. To shed light on this, we perform large-scale Brownian dynamics simulations of a chromatin fiber interacting with an ensemble of (multivalent) DNA-binding proteins able to switch between an "on" (binding) and an "off" (nonbinding) state. This system provides a model for any DNA-binding protein that can be posttranslationally modified to change its affinity for DNA (e.g., through phosphorylation). Protein switching is a nonequilibrium process, and it leads to the formation of clusters of self-limiting size, where individual proteins in a cluster exchange with the soluble pool with kinetics similar to those seen in photobleaching experiments. This behavior contrasts sharply with that exhibited by nonswitching proteins, which are permanently in the on-state; when these bind to DNA nonspecifically, they form clusters that grow indefinitely in size. To explain these findings, we propose a mean-field theory from which we obtain a scaling relation between the typical cluster size and the protein switching rate. Protein switching also reshapes intrachromatin contacts to give networks resembling those seen in topologically associating domains, as switching markedly favors local (short-range) contacts over distant ones. Our results point to posttranslational modification of chromatin-bridging proteins as a generic mechanism driving the self-assembly of highly dynamic, nonequilibrium, protein clusters with the properties of nuclear bodies.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusChromatinDNADNA-Binding ProteinsMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationProtein BindingProtein ConformationChromatinDNADNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28355537
PMCPMC5375003
OpenAlexW2492174871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.