Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28355534›Full record

ReviewBiophysical journal2017

Synthetic Biology: Engineering Living Systems from Biophysical Principles.

Bryan A Bartley, Kyung Kim, J Kyle Medley, Herbert M Sauro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. What's next for computational systems biology?Frontiers in systems biology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mathematical Modelling in Plant Synthetic Biology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  13. Towards an engineering theory of evolution.Nature communications · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bryan A BartleyDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Kyung KimDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
J Kyle MedleyDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Herbert M SauroDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: hsauro@u.washington.edu.

Funding

Continued Development and Maintenance of the Systems Biology WorkbenchR01GM081070 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SAURO, HERBERT M. · 2007 to 2014
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic biology was founded as a biophysical discipline that sought explanations for the origins of life from chemical and physical first principles. Modern synthetic biology has been reinvented as an engineering discipline to design new organisms as well as to better understand fundamental biological mechanisms. However, success is still largely limited to the laboratory and transformative applications of synthetic biology are still in their infancy. Here, we review six principles of living systems and how they compare and contrast with engineered systems. We cite specific examples from the synthetic biology literature that illustrate these principles and speculate on their implications for further study. To fully realize the promise of synthetic biology, we must be aware of life's unique properties.

Indexed as

Biophysical PhenomenaEvolution, MolecularGenetic EngineeringStochastic ProcessesSynthetic Biology

Identifiers

PMID28355534
PMCPMC5376109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.