ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2017
Retrospective Assessment of Occupational Exposures for the GENEVA Study of ALS among Military Veterans.
Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retrospective Exposure Assessment Methods Used in Occupational Human Health Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- A perspective on persistent toxicants in veterans and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: identifying exposures determining higher ALS risk.Journal of neurology · 2022Review
- Ferroptosis Mechanisms Involved in Neurodegenerative Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Population-based study of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and occupational lead exposure in Denmark.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2019Article
- Occupational formaldehyde and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.European journal of epidemiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis paper describes the retrospective exposure assessment conducted to assess occupational exposures for the Genes and Environmental Exposures in Veterans (GENEVA) study, a case-control study investigating the joint contribution of genetics and environmental exposures to the risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) among military veterans.
methodsOccupational histories for 1597 study participants collected as part of the GENEVA study were the basis for this retrospective exposure assessment. The data set included 15528 jobs held from 1924 to 2010, representing 4539 unique industry and occupation (I&O) combinations. Three industrial hygiene experts were recruited to independently rate occupational exposures to specific agents previously associated with an increased risk of ALS. Utilizing information on industry, job title, tasks performed, and materials used for each job held, raters assigned exposures associated with each I&O for the 'current time' defined as the period after 1995 (post-1995). The exposure assessment targeted agents identified as potential occupational risk factors for ALS. Experts rated semi-quantitatively exposure intensity in five exposure categories (0-4) for Group A agents (lead, formaldehyde, hydrocarbon solvents, and chlorinated solvents) and qualitatively as yes/no (1/0) exposed for Group B agents (mercury, selenium, arsenic, polychlorinated biphenyls, electromagnetic field, pesticides, and viral agents). Confidence scores (0-3) were reported for every I&O rated based on raters' experience with that industry and/or job. Each I&O was assigned an average exposure score of the raters and an alternative exposure rating was developed for each I&O by excluding low confidence (<2) scores before averaging. Exposure reconstruction for jobs held pre-1995 was done by comparing exposure data extracted from the OSHA Chemical Exposure and Health Database (CEHD) during pre-1995 and post-1995. For agents with limited exposure data in the CEHD, pre-1995 exposures were determined based on raters' judgment.
resultsThe proportion of I&O combinations determined to be 'exposed' ranged from 0.1 to 26% across different agents, with the highest values corresponding to hydrocarbon solvents and the lowest to selenium. Industries with the highest proportion of exposed records include manufacturing, utilities, healthcare, and military with non-combat jobs. Analyses for raters' reliability showed the best agreement between the raters when rating exposure to viral agents (kappa = 0.67), hydrocarbon solvents (kappa = 0.53), and lead (kappa = 0.50). The proportion of 'exposed' I&O combinations increased for hydrocarbon solvents, chlorinated solvents, and pesticides when exposure ratings were adjusted by raters' confidence. Compared to post-1995, exposures in the earlier period (pre-1995) were deemed higher or the same for most of the agents and lower for formaldehyde and electromagnetic field exposures.
conclusionsOur results indicate that using raters' confidence assessment in determining exposure scores increases both the proportion of I&O combinations regarded as exposed and the intensity scores, suggesting raters tend to be conservative in their assessment when they lack detailed knowledge of an industry or job.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.