ArticlePloS one2017
Streptococcus gallolyticus infection in colorectal cancer and association with biological and clinical factors.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guideline for designing microbiome studies in neoplastic diseases.GeroScience · 2024Guideline
- Streptococcus gallolyticus supernatant induces M2 macrophage polarization and activates IL-17 F signaling in colorectal tumorigenesis.Gut pathogens · 2025Article
- Fecal profiling reveals a common microbial signature for pancreatic cancer in Finnish and Iranian cohorts.Gut pathogens · 2025Article
- Diversity in gut microbiota among colorectal cancer patients: findings from a case-control study conducted at a Tunisian University Hospital.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- The immune interactions of gut glycans and microbiota in health and disease.Molecular microbiology · 2024Review
- The microbial landscape of colorectal cancer.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024Review
- Research progress on the correlation between intestinal flora and colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Identification of Streptococcus gallolyticus in tumor samples of Iranian patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer.BMC research notes · 2022Article
- Gut microbiota modulation: a tool for the management of colorectal cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Review
- Association between colorectal cancer and Fusobacterium nucleatum and Bacteroides fragilis bacteria in Iranian patients: a preliminary study.Infectious agents and cancer · 2021Article
- Polarization of intestinal tumour-associated macrophages regulates the development of schistosomal colorectal cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2021Article
- Article
- Fusobacterium nucleatum in biopsied tissues from colorectal cancer patients and alcohol consumption in Korea.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Detection of Streptococcus gallolyticus in colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease patients compared to control group in southwest of Iran.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
- Extensive bacteriocin gene shuffling in the Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex reveals gallocin D with activity against vancomycin resistant enterococci.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Does microbiome shift play a role in carcinogenesis? A systematic review.Translational cancer research · 2020Review
- Comparison of the clinicopathological features and prognoses of patients with schistosomal and nonschistosomal colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- Inferring Bacterial Infiltration in Primary Colorectal Tumors From Host Whole Genome Sequencing Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Colon Cancer withCase reports in gastrointestinal medicine · 2019Article
- Gut microbiome associated with chemotherapy-induced diarrhea from the CapeOX regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage III colorectal cancer.Gut pathogens · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is an unambiguous association of Streptococcus gallolyticus infection with colorectal cancer, although there is limited information about epidemiology or interaction between molecular and environmental factors. We performed an original quantitative analysis of S. gallolyticus in unselected colorectal cancer patients (n = 190) and their association with clinical, pathological tumor molecular profiles (microsatellite instability, hypermethylator phenotype and chromosomal instability pathways), and other biological factors in colorectal tumor and normal tissues (cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus infection). We developed a new quantitative method to assess bacterial load. Analytical validation was reached with a very high sensitivity and specificity. Our results showed a 3.2% prevalence of S. gallolyticus infection in our unselected cohort of colorectal cancer cases (6/190). The average S. gallolyticus copy number was 7,018 (range 44-34,585). No previous reports relating to S. gallolyticus infection have been published for unselected cohorts of patients. Finally, and despite a low prevalence of S. gallolyticus in this study, we were able to define a specific association with tumor tissue (p = 0.03) and with coinfection with Epstein-Barr virus (p = 0.042; OR: 9.49; 95% IC: 1.1-82.9). The prevalence data provided will be very useful in the design of future studies, and will make it possible to estimate the sample size needed to assess precise objectives. In conclusion, our results show a low prevalence of S. gallolyticus infection in unselected colorectal cancer patients and an association of positive S. gallolyticus infection with tumor tissue and Epstein-Barr virus coinfection. Further studies will be needed to definitively assess the prevalence of S. gallolyticus in colorectal cancer and the associated clinicopathological and molecular profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.