Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28353637›Full record

ReviewMarine drugs2017

Current Status of Marine-Derived Compounds as Warheads in Anti-Tumor Drug Candidates.

David J Newman, Gordon M Cragg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Marine drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Aulosirazoles B and C from the CyanobacteriumJournal of natural products · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Enriching cancer pharmacology with drugs of marine origin.British journal of pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  19. Resistance and Overcoming Resistance in Breast Cancer.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David J NewmanWayne, PA 19087, USA. djnewman664@verizon.net.
Gordon M CraggGaithersburg, MD 20877, USA. gmcragg2@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we have attempted to describe all of the antibody-drug conjugates using a marine-derived compound as the "warhead", that are currently in clinical trials as listed in the current version of the NIH clinical trials database (clinicaltrials.gov). In searching this database, we used the beta-test version currently available, as it permitted more specific search parameters, since the regular version did not always find trials that had been completed in the past with some agents. We also added small discussion sections on candidates that are still at the preclinical stage, including a derivative of diazonamide that has an unusual interaction with tubulin (DZ-23840), which may also be a potential warhead in the future.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesAntineoplastic AgentsAquatic OrganismsBiological ProductsClinical Trials as TopicHumansImmunoconjugatesAntibodiesAntineoplastic AgentsBiological ProductsImmunoconjugatesAntibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs)clinical trialsmarine derived antitumor agents

Identifiers

PMID28353637
PMCPMC5408245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.