Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28353600›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2017

Influence of gum-chewing on postoperative bowel activity after laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: A randomized controlled trial.

Bujun Ge, Hongmei Zhao, Rui Lin, Jialiang Wang, Quanning Chen, Liming Liu, Qi Huang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07315412 (Comparative Effectiveness of Ginger-Mint and Cinnamon-Flavored Gum in Preventing Nausea and Vomiting Following Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07315412 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effectiveness of Ginger-Mint and Cinnamon-Flavored Gum in Preventing Nausea and Vomiting Following Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorFenerbahce UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled75ConditionsPostoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV), Peritoneal Metastases From Colorectal Cancer, Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyArmsGinger-Mint Chewing Gum, Cinnamon Chewing Gum
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bujun GeDepartment of General Surgery, Tongji Hospital Department of Neurology, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hongmei Zhao
Rui Lin
Jialiang Wang
Quanning Chen
Liming Liu
Qi Huang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn some studies, gum-chewing was demonstrated to have a beneficial effect on resumption of bowel function; however, other contradictory findings in other studies refute the effects of gum-chewing on peristaltic movements and digestive system stimulation. In addition, most previous studies were after colorectal or gynecology surgery, whereas few reports focused on the effect of gum-chewing after gastrectomy. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to assess the effectiveness of gum-chewing on postoperative bowel function in patients who had undergone laparoscopic gastrectomy.

methodsFrom March 2014 to March 2016, 75 patients with gastric cancer received elective laparoscopic surgery in Shanghai Tongji hospital and were postoperatively randomly divided into 2 groups: 38 in a gum-chewing (Gum) group and 37 in a control (No gum) group. The patients in the Gum group chewed sugarless gum 3 times daily, each time for at least 15 minutes, until the day of postoperative exhaust defecation.

resultsThe mean time to first flatus (83.4 ± 35.6 vs. 79.2 ± 24.2 hours; P = 0.554) and the mean time to first defecation (125.7 ± 41.2 vs. 115.4 ± 34.2 hours; P = 0.192) were no different between the no gum and Gum groups. There was also no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative ileus (P = 0.896) and postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.109) between the 2 groups. The postoperative pain score at 48 hours (P = 0.032) in the Gum group was significantly higher than in the no gum group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in regards to patient demographics, comorbidities, duration of surgery, complications, and nausea/vomiting score.

conclusionGum-chewing after laparoscopic gastrectomy did not hasten the return of gastrointestinal function. In addition, gum-chewing may increase patient pain on the second postoperative day.

Indexed as

Chewing GumGastrectomyGastrointestinal MotilityPostoperative PeriodAgedFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsChewing Gum

Identifiers

PMID28353600
PMCPMC5380284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.