Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28353155›Full record

Observational studyPaediatric drugs2017

Occurrence of Potential Adverse Drug Events from Prescribing Errors in a Pediatric Intensive and High Dependency Unit in Hong Kong: An Observational Study.

Celeste L Y Ewig, Hon Ming Cheung, Kwok Ho Kam, Hiu Lam Wong, Chad A Knoderer

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Paediatric drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Investigation of the characteristics of medication errors and adverse drug reactions using pharmacovigilance data in China.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Celeste L Y EwigSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong. celeste.ewig@cuhk.edu.hk.
Hon Ming CheungDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Kwok Ho KamSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Hiu Lam WongSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Chad A KnodererCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Butler University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · CNButler University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritically ill pediatric patients are considered at high risk for medication errors. Although much research focuses on the actual errors, equally important are medication errors that, although intercepted, carried the potential for an adverse drug event. The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of prescribing errors and potential adverse drug events (pADEs) in a local pediatric intensive and critical care unit (PICU) in Hong Kong. Our secondary objective was to determine the type of error, nature of medication involved and the time of error occurrence.

methodsWe conducted a prospective observational chart review among patients in a pediatric intensive and high dependency unit between January 16, 2015 and April 20, 2015. Medical charts for each patient were reviewed for the occurrence of a prescribing error or pADE. Each pADE was assessed for the type of error, the classification of agent involved, clinical severity of the error, and the time the error occurred.

resultsForty-one patients with a mean age of 3.2 years were included in our study. Of these patients, 19 (46.3%) experienced at least one pADE. We identified 131 pADEs, 129 of which were prescribing errors conferring a rate of 6.8 errors per affected patient or 3.1 errors per patient admitted to the PICU. The most common error found in the study was incorrect dose calculation (48.1%), with intravenous fluids (41.7%), cardiovascular agents (15.0%), and anti-infectives (12.5%) the most common agents involved with an error. The majority of the pADEs in our study were either clinically serious (33.1%) or significant (44.9%) in nature. Nearly one in every four errors required monitoring and/or intervention to prevent harm, and almost all (96.9%) of the prescribing errors were intercepted before reaching the patient.

conclusionThis study highlights incorrect dose calculation as the most common prescribing error in a pediatric critical care setting. Intravenous fluids, cardiovascular agents, and anti-infectives were the classes of medication most commonly involved with a pADE. Due to the high-risk nature of medications used and the critical condition of these patients, more than three-quarters of pADEs were considered to be clinically serious or significant in causing patient harm.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHong KongHospitalizationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, PediatricMaleMedication ErrorsProspective StudiesRisk

Identifiers

PMID28353155
OpenAlexW2598110708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.