Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28353093›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2017

PD-L2: A prognostic marker in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma?

Franziska Erlmeier, Wilko Weichert, Michael Autenrieth, Max Wiedemann, Andres Jan Schrader, Arndt Hartmann, Philipp Ivanyi, Sandra Steffens

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Controlling T cell-tumor cell interaction with a biomimetic physical barrier for cancer immunotherapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Prognostic impact of PD-1 and its ligands in renal cell carcinoma.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Franziska ErlmeierInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich (TUM), Trogerstraße 18, 81675, Munich, Germany. f.erlmeier@tum.de.
Wilko WeichertInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich (TUM), Trogerstraße 18, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Michael AutenriethDepartment of Urology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Max WiedemannThe Munich Cancer Registry of the Tumorzentrum Munich, Institute of Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andres Jan SchraderMember of the German Renal Cell Tumor Consortium, Jena, Germany.
Arndt HartmannMember of the German Renal Cell Tumor Consortium, Jena, Germany.
Philipp IvanyiDepartment of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Sandra SteffensMember of the German Renal Cell Tumor Consortium, Jena, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of cancer immunotherapy, PD-1 as well as PD-L1 has been widely studied in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PD-1 and PD-L1 play a significant role as prognostic markers in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. In contrast, little is known about PD-L2 expression patterns in RCC, especially in rarer subtypes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, distribution and prognostic impact of PD-L2 expression in chromophobe (ch)RCC. Eighty-one patients who underwent renal surgery due to chRCC were retrospectively evaluated. Tumor specimens were analyzed for PD-L2 expression by immunohistochemistry. Expression data were associated with clinicopathological parameters and overall survival (OS). Twenty-three (28.4%) patients showed a PD-L2 > median (PD-L2 high) staining intensity. No significant association between clinicopathological parameters and PD-L2 expression was identified. A significant difference between 5- and 10-year OS in dependence of PD-L2 expression was found (PD-L2 low 96.4 and 87.7% vs. PD-L2 high 87.1 and 56%; log rank, p = 0.029). However, in multivariate analysis PD-L2 expression failed to be proofed as an independent prognostic factor. In conclusion, to our knowledge this is the first study evaluating the prognostic impact of PD-L2 in a considerably large cohort of chRCC. Our results showed a significant diminished OS in dependence of PD-L2 expression. This implicates that PD-L2 might play a role as prognostic marker in chRCC demanding further evaluation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProgrammed Cell Death 1 Ligand 2 ProteinTissue Array AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorPDCD1LG2 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 Ligand 2 ProteinChromophobe histologyPD-L2Renal cell carcinomaSurvival

Identifiers

PMID28353093
OpenAlexW2600242504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.