Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28353021›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2018

Effect of periodontitis history on implant success: a long-term evaluation during supportive periodontal therapy in a university setting.

Christian Graetz, Karim Fawzy El-Sayed, Antje Geiken, Anna Plaumann, Sonja Sälzer, Eleonore Behrens, Jörg Wiltfang, Christof E Dörfer

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christian GraetzClinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany. graetz@konspar.uni-kiel.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8316-0565
Karim Fawzy El-SayedClinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Antje GeikenClinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Anna PlaumannClinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Sonja SälzerClinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Eleonore BehrensDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Jörg WiltfangDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Christof E DörferClinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term implant survival in patients with a history of chronic periodontitis, during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT), compared to periodontally healthy patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty-nine periodontitis patients (test) with SPT for ≥9 years and implant-supported restorations (≥5 years follow-up) were recruited and pair-matched with 29 periodontally healthy patients (control). Subjects in both groups were examined following active periodontal therapy and/or implantation (T1) (test 69 implants, control 76 implants) and at end of SPT or supportive postimplant therapy (T2). Differences between the groups in implant survival (primary outcome), mean marginal bone loss (MBL) and pocket probing depths (PPDs) (secondary outcomes) were evaluated.

resultsImplant survival over 5 years was 97.1% in test compared to 97.4% in control group (p = 0.562). MBL was significantly different (test 18.7 ± 18.2%; control 12.5 ± 21.3%) (p < 0.05). PPDs increased at T2 in both groups (test: T1 3.4 ± 1.0 mm; T2 4.2 ± 1.6 mm; control: T1 1.0 ± 1.2 mm; T2 2.9 ± 0.8 mm; p < 0.05 between groups). Prognostic factors for implant loss appeared to be the presence of residual periodontal pockets of ≥4 mm (OR 1.90), bone height (OR 1.81) and age (OR 1.16) at T1.

conclusionIn terms of implant survival, no differences were observed between periodontitis and periodontally healthy patients. However, patients with history of periodontitis showed higher MBL and PPDs compared to periodontally healthy patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The presence of a good periodontal maintenance program with preceding successful active periodontal treatment seems to be indispensable components of successful implant treatment in patients with history of chronic periodontitis.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsDental Restoration FailureAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesChronic PeriodontitisDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesDental ImplantsBone lossImplant lossPeriodontitisRisk factorsSupportive periodontal therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.