Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28353015›Full record

Observational studyJournal of occupational rehabilitation2018

Psychosocial Factors Impacting Workplace Injury Rehabilitation: Evaluation of a Concise Screening Tool.

Sareen McLinton, Sarven Savia McLinton, Martin van der Linden

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sareen McLintonCorporate Health Group, 69 Henley Beach Road, Mile End, PO Box 562, Torrensville, SA, 5031, Australia. smclinton@chg.net.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2365-0674
Sarven Savia McLintonAsia Pacific Centre for Work Health and Safety, University of South Australia, IPC-MAG-11, UniSA Magill Campus, Lorne Avenue, Magill, SA, 5072, Australia.
Martin van der LindenCorporate Health Group, 69 Henley Beach Road, Mile End, PO Box 562, Torrensville, SA, 5031, Australia.
University of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose To determine whether the delayed recovery often observed in simple musculoskeletal injuries occurring at work is related to poor workplace and home social support. Method A four question psychosocial screening tool called the "How are you coping gauge?" (HCG) was developed. This tool was implemented as part of the initial assessment for all new musculoskeletal workplace injuries. Participants were excluded if they did not meet the strict criteria used to classify a musculoskeletal injury as simple. The HCG score was then compared to the participant's number of days until return to full capacity (DTFC). It was hypothesised that those workers indicating a poorer level of workplace and home support would take longer time to return to full capacity. Results A sample of 254 participants (316 excluded) were included in analysis. Significant correlation (p < 0.001) was observed between HCG scores for self-reported work and home support and DTFC thereby confirming the hypothesis. Path analysis found workplace support to be a significant moderate-to-strong predictor of DTFC (-0.46). Conclusion A correlation was observed between delayed workplace injury recovery and poor perceived workplace social support. The HCG may be an effective tool for identifying these factors in musculoskeletal workplace injuries of a minor pathophysiological nature. There may be merit in tailoring injury rehabilitation towards addressing psychosocial factors early in the injury recovery process to assist with a more expedient return to full work capacity following simple acute musculoskeletal injury.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultCohort StudiesFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal SystemOccupational InjuriesReturn to WorkSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkers' CompensationWorkplaceMusculoskeletal painOccupational injuriesRehabilitationSocial supportSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28353015
OpenAlexW2600795620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.