Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28353007›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2017

Clarifying Values and Preferences for Care Near the End of Life: The Role of a New Lay Workforce.

Debra K Litzelman, Thomas S Inui, Kathleen M Schmitt-Wendholt, Anthony Perkins, Wilma J Griffin, Ann H Cottingham, Steven S Ivy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Using Implementation Science to Further the Adoption and Implementation of Advance Care Planning in Rural Primary Care.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Debra K LitzelmanRegenstrief Institute, Inc., 1101 West Tenth Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202-4800, USA. dklitzel@iu.edu.
Thomas S InuiRegenstrief Institute, Inc., 1101 West Tenth Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202-4800, USA.
Kathleen M Schmitt-WendholtRegenstrief Institute, Inc., 1101 West Tenth Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202-4800, USA.
Anthony PerkinsIndiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University Center for Healthcare Innovation and Implementation Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Wilma J GriffinIndiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ann H CottinghamDepartment of Medicine, IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Steven S IvyIndiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

Uniting the Formal and Informal Curriculum in a Behavioral and Social Science IntR25AR060994 · NIAMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI HEADRICK, LINDA ANN, LITZELMAN, DEBRA K · 2011 to 2015
$1.2M
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases 5R25AR060994NIAMS NIH HHS R25 AR060994Walther Cancer Foundation 1C1CMS331000-01-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community health workers (CHWs) can engage elderly persons in advance care planning (ACP) conversations. We report how trained CHWs used Go Wish cards (GW

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningCommunity Health WorkersPatient PreferenceTerminal CareAgedFemaleHumansMalePublic HealthClarifying end-of-life goalsCommunity health workerEnd-of-life conversations

Identifiers

PMID28353007
PMCPMC5617783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.