Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28352777›Full record

ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2016

Prevention and treatment of peritoneal adhesions in patients affected by vascular diseases following surgery: a review of the literature.

Aldo Rocca, Giovanni Aprea, Giuseppe Surfaro, Maurizio Amato, Antonio Giuliani, Marianna Paccone, Andrea Salzano, Anna Russo, Domenico Tafuri, Bruno Amato

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Oral Administration Evaluation of the Hydro-Ethanolic Extract of Ginger (Rhizome ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Biomaterials to Prevent Post-Operative Adhesion.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Aldo RoccaDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy . Via Sergio Pansini, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Giovanni ApreaDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Italy.
Giuseppe SurfaroUnit of Surgery, A. Cardarelli Hospital, Campo-basso, Italy.
Maurizio AmatoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Italy.
Antonio GiulianiUnit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Transplantation, "A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Marianna PacconeDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Andrea SalzanoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Anna RussoSanta Maria delle Grazie Hospital, Pathology Unit, Pozzuoli, Naples, Italy.
Domenico TafuriDepartment of Sport Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy.
Bruno AmatoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITFatebenefratelli Hospital · ITOspedale Santa Maria · ITParthenope University of Naples · ITUniversity of Molise · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intra-abdominal adhesions are the most frequently occurring postoperative complication following abdomino-pelvic surgery. Abdominal and pelvic surgery can lead to peritoneal adhesion formation causing infertility, chronic pelvic pain, and intestinal obstruction. Laparoscopy today is considered the gold standard of care in the treatment of several abdominal pathologies as well as in a wide range of vascular diseases. Laparoscopy has several advantages in comparison to open surgery. These include rapid recovery times, shorter hospitalisation, reduced postoperative pain, as well as cosmetic benefits. The technological improvements in this particular surgical field along with the development of modern techniques and the acquisition of specific laparoscopic skills have allowed for its wider utilization in operations with fully intracorporeal anastomoses. Postoperative adhesions are caused by aberrant peritoneal healing and are the leading cause of postoperative bowel obstruction. The use of anti-adherence barriers is currently being advocated for their prevention. The outcome of the investigation showed adhesion formation inhibition without direct detrimental effects on anastomotic healing. Poor anasto-motic healing can provoke adhesions even in the presence of anti-adhesion barriers. This review gives a short overview on the current evidence on the pathophysiology and prevention of peritoneal adhesions.

Indexed as

Anti-adhesive barriersLaparoscopyPainPeritoneal adhesionsVascular Surgery

Identifiers

PMID28352777
PMCPMC5329808
OpenAlexW2465183989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.