Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28352539›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2016

Antimicrobial activities of secondary metabolites and phylogenetic study of sponge endosymbiotic bacteria,

Gopi Mohan, Ajith Kumar Thipparamalai Thangappanpillai, Balagurunathan Ramasamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A novel bacterial symbiont in the seaweedFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Drought ExposedFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gopi MohanCentre for Marine Living Resources & Ecology (MoES), Field Research Station, Agatti Island, 682 553 Lakshadweep U. T., India; CAS in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, Annamalai University, Parangipettai, 608 502 Tamil Nadu, India.
Ajith Kumar Thipparamalai ThangappanpillaiCAS in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, Annamalai University, Parangipettai, 608 502 Tamil Nadu, India; National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Indian Council for Agricultural Research, Lucknow, UP, India.
Balagurunathan RamasamyDepartment of Microbiology, Periyar University, Salem 636 011, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Twenty-one species of sponges were recorded under the class of Demospongiae and Calcareous sponges of which 19 species were new to Agatti reef. A total of 113 Sponge endosymbiotic bacterial strains were isolated from twenty-one species of sponges and screened for antimicrobial activity. Five bacterial strains of sponge endosymbiotic bacteria (SEB) namely SEB32, SEB33, SEB36, SEB43 and SEB51 showed antimicrobial activity against virulent marine fish pathogens such as

Indexed as

Bacillus sp.Lakshadweep archipelagoSecondary metabolitesSponge endosymbiotic bacteria

Identifiers

PMID28352539
PMCPMC5042297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.