Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28352519›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2016

Heterotrophic cultivation of

Thangapandi Marudhupandi, Ramamoorthy Sathishkumar, Thipramalai Thankappan Ajith Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of Orange Peel-Derived Carbon Sources onBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Coproduction of lipids and carotenoids by the novel green algaBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  4. Quantitative Proteomics ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Influence of Carbon Sources on Biomass and Biomolecule Accumulation inInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thangapandi MarudhupandiCentre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences Annamalai University, Parangipettai 608502, Tamil Nadu, India; Centre for Ocean Research, Sathyabama University, Jeppiaar Nagar, Chennai 600119, India.
Ramamoorthy SathishkumarCentre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences Annamalai University, Parangipettai 608502, Tamil Nadu, India.
Thipramalai Thankappan Ajith KumarCentre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences Annamalai University, Parangipettai 608502, Tamil Nadu, India; National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Indian Council of Agriculture Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226002, India.
Annamalai University · INSathyabama Institute of Science and Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to enhance the biomass and lipid content in

Indexed as

BiomassFatty acidHeterotrophic cultivationNannochloropsis salinaResponse surface methodology

Identifiers

PMID28352519
PMCPMC5040862
OpenAlexW2285692608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.