ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2017
CDC's Male Circumcision Recommendations Represent a Key Public Health Measure.
Article in Global health, science and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: A systematic review.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Assessment of the Knowledge and Attitudes of Muslim Religious Officials Regarding Male Circumcision: The Case of Turkey.Journal of religion and health · 2025Article
- Male infant circumcision and associated factors in Konso Zone Southern Ethiopia: community based survey.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Clinical outcomes of circumcisions and prevalence of complications of male circumcisions: A five-year retrospective analysis at a teaching hospital in Ghana.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Neonatal Male Circumcision: Clearly Beneficial for Public Health or an Ethical Dilemma? A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Comments by opponents on the British Medical Association's guidance on non-therapeutic male circumcision of children seem one-sided and may undermine public health.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2023Article
- [Skin manifestations of the external male genitals].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Factors influencing satisfaction with male circumcision in Taiwan.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Systematic review of complications arising from male circumcision.BJUI compass · 2022Review
- Evidence-based circumcision policy for Australia.Journal of men's health · 2022Article
- Decision-Making Regarding Newborn Circumcision: A Qualitative Analysis.Maternal and child health journal · 2021Article
- Is tablet-based interactive distraction effective on pain and anxiety during circumcision in children? A randomized controlled trial.Turkish journal of urology · 2021Article
- Recent Advances in the Management of Penile Cancer: A Contemporary Review of the Literature.Oncology and therapy · 2021Review
- Penile Glans Amputation following Circumcision: A Case Report of a Rare Complication.Case reports in urology · 2020Article
- Male circumcision and Sexually transmitted Infections - An update.Indian journal of sexually transmitted diseases and AIDSReview
- "Getting to Zero New HIV Infections in the Caribbean": Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Male Circumcision Among Adolescent Males in The Bahamas.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.