Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28351347›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2017

Sporobolus stapfianus: Insights into desiccation tolerance in the resurrection grasses from linking transcriptomics to metabolomics.

Abou Yobi, Karen A Schlauch, Richard L Tillett, Won C Yim, Catherine Espinoza, Bernard W M Wone, John C Cushman, Melvin J Oliver

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The promise of resurrection plants in enhancing crop tolerance to water scarcity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Metabolite Profiling of the Resurrection GrassPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Coevolution of tandemly repeatedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A comparative genomics examination of desiccation tolerance and sensitivity in two sister grass species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Systems biology of resurrection plants.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Intertwined signatures of desiccation and drought tolerance in grasses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Abou YobiU.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Plant Genetic Research Unit, University of Missouri Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA.
Karen A SchlauchNevada INBRE Bioinformatics Core, University of Nevada Reno, Nevada, 89557, USA.
Richard L TillettNevada INBRE Bioinformatics Core, University of Nevada Reno, Nevada, 89557, USA.
Won C YimDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nevada Reno, Nevada, 89557, USA.
Catherine EspinozaDivision of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA.
Bernard W M WoneDepartment of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, 57069, USA.
John C CushmanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nevada Reno, Nevada, 89557, USA.
Melvin J OliverU.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Plant Genetic Research Unit, University of Missouri Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA. mel.oliver@ars.usda.gov.
University of Nevada, Reno · USAgricultural Research Service · USUniversity of Missouri · USUniversity of South Dakota · US

Funding

Outreach/Diversity/Pipeline ProjectP20GM103440 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI Julia Petereit · 2012 to 2026
$58.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the response of resurrection angiosperms to dehydration and rehydration is critical for deciphering the mechanisms of how plants cope with the rigors of water loss from their vegetative tissues. We have focused our studies on the C

methodsWe have combined non-targeted metabolomics with transcriptomics, via a NimbleGen array platform, to develop an understanding of how gene expression and metabolite profiles can be linked to generate a more detailed mechanistic appreciation of the cellular response to both desiccation and rehydration.

resultsThe rehydration transcriptome and metabolome are primarily geared towards the rapid return of photosynthesis, energy metabolism, protein turnover, and protein synthesis during the rehydration phase. However, there are some metabolites associated with ROS protection that remain elevated during rehydration, most notably the tocopherols. The analysis of the dehydration transcriptome reveals a strong concordance between transcript abundance and the associated metabolite abundance reported earlier, but only in responses that are directly related to cellular protection during dehydration: carbohydrate metabolism and redox homeostasis. The transcriptome response also provides strong support for the involvement of cellular protection processes as exemplified by the increases in the abundance of transcripts encoding late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins, anti-oxidant enzymes, early light-induced proteins (ELIP) proteins, and cell-wall modification enzymes. There is little concordance between transcript and metabolite abundance for processes such as amino acid metabolism that do not appear to contribute directly to cellular protection, but are nonetheless important for the desiccation tolerant phenotype of S. stapfianus.

conclusionsThe transcriptomes of both dehydration and rehydration offer insight into the complexity of the regulation of responses to these processes that involve complex signaling pathways and associated transcription factors. ABA appears to be important in the control of gene expression in both the latter stages of the dehydration and the early stages of rehydration. These findings add to the growing body of information detailing how plants tolerate and survive the severe cellular perturbations of dehydration, desiccation, and rehydration.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantAbscisic AcidAntioxidantsCarbohydrate MetabolismCell WallDehydrationEnergy MetabolismEnzymesGene Expression ProfilingMetabolomicsPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsPoaceaeTranscription FactorsAbscisic AcidAntioxidantsEnzymesPlant ProteinsTranscription FactorsAbiotic stressDehydration stressGene expressionRehydrationResurrection plantsSporobolus stapfianus

Identifiers

PMID28351347
PMCPMC5371216
OpenAlexW2603877921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.