Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28351221›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2017

Stanley Chu, Shankar Lalitha Sridhar, Umut Akalp, Stacey C Skaalure, Franck J Vernerey, Stephanie J Bryant

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Synthetic alternatives to Matrigel.Nature reviews. Materials · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stanley Chu1 Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado , Boulder, Colorado.
Shankar Lalitha Sridhar2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado , Boulder, Colorado.
Umut Akalp2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado , Boulder, Colorado.
Stacey C Skaalure1 Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado , Boulder, Colorado.
Franck J Vernerey2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado , Boulder, Colorado.
Stephanie J Bryant1 Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado , Boulder, Colorado.
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Personalizing Matrix Assisted Autologous Chondrocyte ImplantationR01AR065441 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BRYANT, STEPHANIE J · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR065441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzyme-sensitive hydrogels are promising cell delivery vehicles for cartilage tissue engineering. However, a better understanding of their spatiotemporal degradation behavior and its impact on tissue growth is needed. The goal of this study was to combine experimental and computational approaches to provide new insights into spatiotemporal changes in hydrogel crosslink density and extracellular matrix (ECM) growth and how these changes influence the evolving macroscopic properties as a function of time. Hydrogels were designed from aggrecanase-sensitive peptide crosslinks using a simple and robust thiol-norbornene photoclick reaction. To study the influence of variations in cellular activity of different donors, chondrocytes were isolated from either juvenile or adult bovine donors. Initial studies were performed to validate and calibrate the model against experiments. Through this process, two key features were identified. These included spatial variations in the hydrogel crosslink density in the immediate vicinity of the cell and the presence of cell clustering within the construct. When these spatial heterogeneities were incorporated into the computational model along with model inputs of initial hydrogel properties and cellular activity (i.e., enzyme and ECM production rates), the model was able to capture the spatial and temporal evolution of ECM growth that was observed experimentally for both donors. In this study, the juvenile chondrocytes produced an interconnected matrix within the cell clusters leading to overall improved ECM growth, while the adult chondrocytes resulted in poor ECM growth. Overall, the computational model was able to capture the spatiotemporal ECM growth of two different donors and provided new insights into the importance of spatial heterogeneities in facilitating ECM growth. Our long-term goal is to use this model to predict optimal hydrogel designs for a wide range of donors and improve cartilage tissue engineering.

Indexed as

AnimalsCartilageCattleComputer SimulationCross-Linking ReagentsElastic ModulusEndopeptidasesExtracellular MatrixHydrogelsPolyethylene GlycolsTime FactorsTissue EngineeringaggrecanaseCross-Linking ReagentsEndopeptidasesHydrogelsPolyethylene Glycolsaggrecanasechondrocytecomputational modelingenzyme-sensitive hydrogels

Identifiers

PMID28351221
PMCPMC5568186
OpenAlexW2620770173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.