ReviewIl Giornale di chirurgia
Topical hemostasis in laparoscopic surgery.
Review in Il Giornale di chirurgia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flexible Catechol-Conjugated Chitosan/Gelatin Bilayer Patches for Topical Hemostasis in Laparoscopic Surgery.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Review of Evidence Supporting the Arista™ Absorbable Powder Hemostat.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Review
- Safety considerations in laparoscopic surgery: A narrative review.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022Review
- Surgical and oncological efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer by propensity score matching: a retrospective comparative study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021Article
- Review
- Laparoscopic splenectomy for a simultaneous wandering spleen along with an ectopic accessory spleen. Case report and review of the literature.International journal of surgery case reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A major goal during any surgical intervention is minimization of blood loss, which reduces the need for blood transfusion. In open surgery, the possibility for the surgeon to use the hands directly in contact with the bleeding tissues for hemostasis, makes mechanical methods, such as compression, ligatures or sutures, important to achieve proper hemostasis. In laparoscopic surgery, where the intervention is performed by means of small incisions through which the surgeon's hand cannot directly achieve the tissues, the problem of hemostasis is critical and needs more attention. Either in open or in laparoscopic surgery, significant bleeding during surgery is controlled through vessel ligation, suturing, and electrocautery. Topical hemostatic agents are useful adjuncts to surgical hemostasis for controlling non-specific bleeding. The introduction of different devices and topical agents has made possible to perform more complex interventions also in laparoscopy. The Authors discuss about the type, the field of application, the side effects of the hemostatic devices and of the topical hemostatic agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.