Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28350954›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2017

Integrating Drug's Mode of Action into Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships for Improved Prediction of Drug-Induced Liver Injury.

Leihong Wu, Zhichao Liu, Scott Auerbach, Ruili Huang, Minjun Chen, Kristin McEuen, Joshua Xu, Hong Fang, Weida Tong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leihong WuNational Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration , 3900 NCTR RD, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, United States.
Zhichao LiuNational Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration , 3900 NCTR RD, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, United States.
Scott AuerbachDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences , 111 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, North Carolina 27709, United States.
Ruili HuangNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health , 9800 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.
Minjun ChenNational Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration , 3900 NCTR RD, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, United States.
Kristin McEuenUniversity of Arkansas at Little Rock , 2801 S University Ave, Little Rock, Arkansas 72204, United States.
Joshua XuNational Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration , 3900 NCTR RD, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, United States.
Hong FangNational Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration , 3900 NCTR RD, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, United States.
Weida TongNational Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration , 3900 NCTR RD, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4093-3708

Funding

Small molecule screening programZ01HG200319 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER P · 2004 to 2008
$32.3M
Toxicology in the 21st Century Program (Tox21) - Computational ToxicologyZIATR000040 · NCATS · NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES · PI HUANG, RUILI · 2016 to 2025
$3.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 HG200319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is complex in mechanism. Different drugs could undergo different mechanisms but result in the same DILI type, while the same drug could lead to different DILI types via different mechanisms. Therefore, predicting a drug's potential for DILI should take its underlying mechanisms into consideration. To achieve that, we constructed a novel approach by incorporating the drug's Mode of Action (MOA) into Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) modeling. This MOA-DILI approach was examined using a data set of 333 drugs. The drugs were first grouped according to their MOA profiles (positive or negative in each MOA) based on the Tox21 qHTS assays. QSAR models for individual MOA assays were developed and subsequently combined to obtain the MOA-DILI model. A hold-out testing strategy (222 drugs for training and 111 drugs as a test set) was employed, which yielded a predictive accuracy of 0.711. The MOA-DILI model was directly compared with the standard QSAR approach using the same hold-out strategy, and the QSAR model yielded an accuracy of 0.662. To minimize the random chance in splitting training/test sets, the hold-out testing process was repeated 1000 times, and the observed difference in prediction accuracy between MOA-DILI and QSARs was statistically significant (P value <0.0001). Out of 17 MOAs used, four assays (i.e., antioxidant response elements, PPAR-gamma, estrogen receptor, and thyroid receptor assays) contributed most to the improved prediction of the MOA-DILI model over QSARs. In conclusion, the MOA-DILI approach has the potential to significantly improve predictive outcomes and to reveal complex relationships between MOAs and DILI, all of which would be helpful in developing DILI predictive models in drug screening and for risk assessment of industrial chemicals.

Indexed as

Chemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryPharmaceutical PreparationsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipComputational BiologyModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID28350954
PMCPMC6233892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.