ArticleBritish journal of cancer2017
The PICTURE study: diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men requiring a repeat prostate biopsy.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Office Based MRI/Ultrasound Guided Prostate Cancer Ablation: Outcomes Registry
TRANBERG® Transperineal MR/US Focalyx Fusion Laser--Induced Thermal Therapy in the Office Setting Under Local Anesthesia
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-center, prospective phase 2 trial of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in patients with unilateral localized prostate cancer: good functional results but oncologically not as safe as expected.World journal of urology · 2023Trial
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsies Compared to Transperineal Mapping Biopsies Before Focal Ablation in Localised and Metastatic Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radiotherapy.European urology · 2022Trial
- Enhancing foundation model transfer for prostate cancer detection with patch-level contrastive learning.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- On the degrees of freedom of gridded control points in learning-based medical image registration.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Combining tissue biomarkers with mpMRI to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. Analysis of 21 biomarkers in the PICTURE study.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Article
- Multiparametric MRI before and after Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Pearls and Pitfalls for the Reporting Radiologist.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Review
- Assessment of diagnostic value of unilateral systematic biopsy combined with targeted biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2024Article
- Clinical utility of transperineal template-guided mapping prostate biopsy in a selection of patients under active surveillance and confirmation of patients with negative biopsy for prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Prostate MRI and PSMA-PET in the Primary Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Standardized prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates following initial non-malignant biopsy result.BJU international · 2023Article
- PI-RADS 3 score: A retrospective experience of clinically significant prostate cancer detection.BJUI compass · 2023Article
- Regional Histopathology and Prostate MRI Positivity: A Secondary Analysis of the PROMIS Trial.Radiology · 2023Article
- Integrating biomarkers and multi-parametric MRI to provide enhanced clinical diagnosis for prostate cancer.Frontiers in urology · 2023Review
- Negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: further outcome and consequences.World journal of urology · 2022Article
- Evidence-based guideline recommendations on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer: A Cancer Care Ontario updated clinical practice guideline.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Abbreviated Bi-Parametric MRI (a-bpMRI) for Prostate Cancer Detection and Screening: A Multi-Reader Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- The Application of Biopsy Density in Transperineal Templated-Guided Biopsy Patients With PI-RADS<3.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- AutoProstate: Towards Automated Reporting of Prostate MRI for Prostate Cancer Assessment Using Deep Learning.Cancers · 2021Article
- Assessment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-fusion prostate biopsy with concurrent standard systematic ultrasound-guided biopsy among men requiring repeat biopsy.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTransrectal prostate biopsy has limited diagnostic accuracy. Prostate Imaging Compared to Transperineal Ultrasound-guided biopsy for significant prostate cancer Risk Evaluation (PICTURE) was a paired-cohort confirmatory study designed to assess diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in men requiring a repeat biopsy.
methodsAll underwent 3 T mpMRI and transperineal template prostate mapping biopsies (TTPM biopsies). Multiparametric MRI was reported using Likert scores and radiologists were blinded to initial biopsies. Men were blinded to mpMRI results. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as Gleason ⩾4+3 and/or cancer core length ⩾6 mm.
resultsTwo hundred and forty-nine had both tests with mean (s.d.) age was 62 (7) years, median (IQR) PSA 6.8 ng ml (4.98-9.50), median (IQR) number of previous biopsies 1 (1-2) and mean (s.d.) gland size 37 ml (15.5). On TTPM biopsies, 103 (41%) had clinically significant prostate cancer. Two hundred and fourteen (86%) had a positive prostate mpMRI using Likert score ⩾3; sensitivity was 97.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 92-99), specificity 21.9% (15.5-29.5), negative predictive value (NPV) 91.4% (76.9-98.1) and positive predictive value (PPV) 46.7% (35.2-47.8). One hundred and twenty-nine (51.8%) had a positive mpMRI using Likert score ⩾4; sensitivity was 80.6% (71.6-87.7), specificity 68.5% (60.3-75.9), NPV 83.3% (75.4-89.5) and PPV 64.3% (55.4-72.6).
conclusionsIn men advised to have a repeat prostate biopsy, prostate mpMRI could be used to safely avoid a repeat biopsy with high sensitivity for clinically significant cancers. However, such a strategy can miss some significant cancers and overdiagnose insignificant cancers depending on the mpMRI score threshold used to define which men should be biopsied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.