Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28350523›Full record

ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2017

Comparison of micro-CT and cone beam CT on the feasibility of assessing trabecular structures in mandibular condyle.

Xin Liang, Zuyan Zhang, Jianping Gu, Zhihui Wang, Bart Vandenberghe, Reinhilde Jacobs, Jie Yang, Guowu Ma, Haibin Ling, Xuchen Ma

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A comprehensive patient-specific prediction model for temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis progression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Xin Liang1 School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Zuyan Zhang1 School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jianping Gu3 Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Zhihui Wang1 School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Bart Vandenberghe4 Oral Imaging Center, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Reinhilde Jacobs4 Oral Imaging Center, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jie Yang5 Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Guowu Ma2 School of Stomatology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Haibin Ling6 Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Xuchen Ma1 School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNDalian Medical University · CNKU Leuven · BETemple University · USTsinghua University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the accuracy of CBCT in assessing trabecular structures.

methodsTwo human mandibles were scanned by micro-CT (Skyscan 1173 high-energy spiral scan micro-CT; Skyscan NV, Kontich, Belgium) and CBCT (3D Accuitomo 170; Morita, Japan). The CBCT images were reconstructed with 0.5 and 1 mm thicknesses. The condylar images were selected for registration. A parallel algorithm for histogram computation was introduced to perform the registration. A mutual information (MI) value was used to evaluate the match between the images obtained from micro-CT and CBCT.

resultsIn comparison with the micro-CT image for the two samples, the CBCT image with 0.5 mm thickness has a MI value of 0.873 and 0.903 while that with 1.0 mm thickness has a MI value of 0.741 and 0.752. The CBCT images with 0.5 mm thickness were better matched with micro-CT images.

conclusionsCBCT shows comparable accuracy with high-resolution micro-CT in assessing trabecular structures. CBCT can be a feasible tool to evaluate osseous changes of jaw bones.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCadaverCone-Beam Computed TomographyFeasibility StudiesHumansMandibular CondyleRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedX-Ray MicrotomographyCBCTmicro-CTtrabecular structure

Identifiers

PMID28350523
PMCPMC5595038
OpenAlexW2603693677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.