Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28350376›Full record

ArticleScientific data2017

Event-related potential data from a guess the number brain-computer interface experiment on school children.

R Mouček, L Vařeka, T Prokop, J Štěbeták, P Brůha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R MoučekNTIS-New Technologies for the Information Society, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitní 8, Plzeň 306 14, Czech Republic.
L VařekaNTIS-New Technologies for the Information Society, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitní 8, Plzeň 306 14, Czech Republic.
T ProkopNTIS-New Technologies for the Information Society, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitní 8, Plzeň 306 14, Czech Republic.
J ŠtěbetákNTIS-New Technologies for the Information Society, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitní 8, Plzeň 306 14, Czech Republic.
P BrůhaNTIS-New Technologies for the Information Society, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitní 8, Plzeň 306 14, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guess the number is a simple P300-based brain-computer interface experiment. Its aim is to ask the measured participant to pick a number between 1 and 9. Then, he or she is exposed to corresponding visual stimuli and experimenters try to guess the number thought while they are observing event-related potential waveforms on-line. 250 school-age children participated in the experiments that were carried out in elementary and secondary schools in the Czech Republic. Electroencephalographic data from three EEG channels (Fz, Cz, Pz) and stimuli markers were stored. Additional metadata about the participants were collected (gender, age, laterality, the number thought by the participant, the guess of the experimenters, and various interesting additional information). Consequently, we offer the largest publicly available odd-ball paradigm collection of datasets to neuroscientific and brain-computer interface community.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesAdolescentChildCzech RepublicElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID28350376
PMCPMC5369320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.