Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28350094›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of oncology2017

Routine genetic testing of lung cancer specimens derived from surgery, bronchoscopy and fluid aspiration by next generation sequencing.

Gou Yamamoto, Mari Kikuchi, Shiho Kobayashi, Yoshiko Arai, Kenji Fujiyoshi, Tomokazu Wakatsuki, Miho Kakuta, Yuki Yamane, Yoshihito Iijima, Hideaki Mizutani and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparison between Immunocytochemistry, FISH and NGS forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Gou YamamotoDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prevention, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Kitaadachi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.
Mari KikuchiDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prevention, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Kitaadachi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.
Shiho KobayashiDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prevention, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Kitaadachi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.
Yoshiko AraiDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prevention, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Kitaadachi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.
Kenji FujiyoshiDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prevention, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Kitaadachi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.
Tomokazu WakatsukiDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prevention, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Kitaadachi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.
Miho KakutaDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prevention, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Kitaadachi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.
Yuki YamaneDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Kitaadachi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.
Yoshihito IijimaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Kitaadachi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.
Hideaki MizutaniDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Kitaadachi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.
Yuki NakajimaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Kitaadachi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.
Junko SudoDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Kitaadachi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.
Hiroyasu KinoshitaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Kitaadachi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.
Futoshi KurimotoDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Kitaadachi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.
Hirohiko AkiyamaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Kitaadachi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.
Hidetaka UramotoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinaka, Kahoku, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan.
Hiroshi SakaiDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Kitaadachi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.
Yoshito AkagiDepartment of Surgery, Kurume University, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Kiwamu AkagiDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prevention, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Kitaadachi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After the development of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), genetic testing of EGFR became required for effective treatment of lung cancer. Initially, the testing was conducted separately for each mutated region. However, many EGFR mutations have since been identified that determine the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs. Therefore, genetic testing of EGFR by next generation sequencing (NGS) may be a suitable strategy for lung cancer. Here we examined the applicability of the NGS method in regard to sensitivity, time and cost. A total of 939 specimens were obtained from 686 lung cancer patients at our hospital. DNA and RNA were simultaneously extracted from specimens derived from surgery, bronchoscopy, and fluid aspiration. Specimens included cerebrospinal fluid, pleural effusion, abdominal fluid, and pericardial effusion. From RNA, target regions (EGFR, KRAS, ALK fusion and RET fusion) were enriched by RT-PCR and sequenced with MiSeq. From DNA, PCR or PCR-RFLP conventional methods were performed. NGS and conventional methods were carried out routinely per week. Among the total 939 specimens, 38 specimens could not be examined with NGS. Among these, 34 specimens were analyzed by conventional testing with simultaneously extracted DNA. The remaining four specimens could not be tested with either method. Compared with the conventional method, the concordance rate of mutations was 99% (892/901), excluding specimens with NGS failure. The time period required from processing of specimens to results was 4 days, and the cost per sample was sufficiently low. In conclusion, the genetic testing with NGS method was useful for lung cancer treatment. The cost, sensitivity and time were able to tolerate routine examinations.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseBronchoscopyErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMutationOncogene Proteins, FusionProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retALK protein, humanAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsKRAS protein, humanOncogene Proteins, FusionProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Receptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesRET protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28350094
PMCPMC5403533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.